Keep provider connections alive: TLS handshake costs 4.2s and is paid twice per dictation

Ouverte
#998 2 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
3/5
Temps estimé
1-2 jours
Accessibilité débutants
45/100
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
rust

Piste de recherche

No files are named; start by finding where the provider HTTP client is built for each transcription/polishing request and for the LLM channel-health check (likely a client constructed per call). Confirm connections are torn down after each dictation. Done means a pooled client with a multi-minute idle timeout, a warm-up at startup and on provider/model change, and a configurable request timeout — the issue's 4.2s cold vs 0.18s warm timings are the acceptance signal.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

Summary

On networks where the TLS handshake to the provider is slow, every dictation pays the handshake
cost twice
— once for transcription and once for LLM polishing — because connections are not
kept alive between dictations. On this machine that is the single largest latency term.

Measurements (Windows 11, OpenLess 1.3.18, BYOK OpenAI)

Two requests in a row, the second reusing the connection:

request 1: tcp connect 0.125s | TLS handshake 4.194s | total 4.410s
request 2: tcp connect 0.000s | TLS handshake 0.000s | total 0.183s

The TLS handshake alone costs ~4.2 s; a reused connection answers in 0.18 s, 24x faster.

Supporting numbers:

  • DNS resolution is fine: 259-369 ms, same as any other host. Not the bottleneck.
  • TCP connect is fine: 0.125 s.
  • chatgpt.com behaves identically (~4.1 s on first hit). The ChatGPT website feels instant only
    because the browser keeps one connection open for the whole session.
  • Upload is not the bottleneck: 300 KB takes 2.3 s warm vs 5.4 s cold. The delta is the handshake.

This looks like SNI-based traffic inspection on the ISP side. It is outside the control of the app,
but the app decides how often that cost is paid.

What it looks like in the app

Avg per segment on this machine showed 9.5 s; individual dictations 3.1-5.7 s. The channel
health check for the LLM provider reported 5292 ms. Local ASR was tried as well (Foundry Local and
sherpa-onnx, several Whisper sizes), but with a cloud provider the handshake cost is paid on every
dictation and dominates everything else.

Requests
  1. Keep provider connections alive between dictations — a connection pool with a multi-minute
    idle timeout instead of closing after each request.
  2. Warm up the connection when the app starts, and after the provider or model is changed,
    so the handshake is paid once per session instead of before each dictation.
  3. If a request timeout exists, make it configurable. With a 4 s handshake plus a long
    recording, a fixed short limit produces confusing timeout errors.
Why this is worth doing

For users behind traffic inspection this term is larger than model choice or prompt size.
Two connection settings would cut several seconds off every dictation without changing any
product behaviour.

Related: #994 (plain-text insertion mode).

Langage dominant
Rust
Étoiles
3.7k
Forks
349
Merge moyen
2 j 14 h
PR mergées (30 j)
97

Préparer son environnement

Ce projet ne fournit ni conteneur de développement, ni Dockerfile, ni guide de contribution : l'installation est à votre charge. Commencez par son README, et consultez notre guide de la première contribution pour les étapes générales.

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de Open-Less/openless

Toutes les issues de Open-Less/openless

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Rust

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.