Keep provider connections alive: TLS handshake costs 4.2s and is paid twice per dictation

Abierto
#998 2 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
3/5
Tiempo estimado
1-2 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Stack tecnológico
rust

Línea de trabajo

No files are named; start by finding where the provider HTTP client is built for each transcription/polishing request and for the LLM channel-health check (likely a client constructed per call). Confirm connections are torn down after each dictation. Done means a pooled client with a multi-minute idle timeout, a warm-up at startup and on provider/model change, and a configurable request timeout — the issue's 4.2s cold vs 0.18s warm timings are the acceptance signal.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Summary

On networks where the TLS handshake to the provider is slow, every dictation pays the handshake
cost twice
— once for transcription and once for LLM polishing — because connections are not
kept alive between dictations. On this machine that is the single largest latency term.

Measurements (Windows 11, OpenLess 1.3.18, BYOK OpenAI)

Two requests in a row, the second reusing the connection:

request 1: tcp connect 0.125s | TLS handshake 4.194s | total 4.410s
request 2: tcp connect 0.000s | TLS handshake 0.000s | total 0.183s

The TLS handshake alone costs ~4.2 s; a reused connection answers in 0.18 s, 24x faster.

Supporting numbers:

  • DNS resolution is fine: 259-369 ms, same as any other host. Not the bottleneck.
  • TCP connect is fine: 0.125 s.
  • chatgpt.com behaves identically (~4.1 s on first hit). The ChatGPT website feels instant only
    because the browser keeps one connection open for the whole session.
  • Upload is not the bottleneck: 300 KB takes 2.3 s warm vs 5.4 s cold. The delta is the handshake.

This looks like SNI-based traffic inspection on the ISP side. It is outside the control of the app,
but the app decides how often that cost is paid.

What it looks like in the app

Avg per segment on this machine showed 9.5 s; individual dictations 3.1-5.7 s. The channel
health check for the LLM provider reported 5292 ms. Local ASR was tried as well (Foundry Local and
sherpa-onnx, several Whisper sizes), but with a cloud provider the handshake cost is paid on every
dictation and dominates everything else.

Requests
  1. Keep provider connections alive between dictations — a connection pool with a multi-minute
    idle timeout instead of closing after each request.
  2. Warm up the connection when the app starts, and after the provider or model is changed,
    so the handshake is paid once per session instead of before each dictation.
  3. If a request timeout exists, make it configurable. With a 4 s handshake plus a long
    recording, a fixed short limit produces confusing timeout errors.
Why this is worth doing

For users behind traffic inspection this term is larger than model choice or prompt size.
Two connection settings would cut several seconds off every dictation without changing any
product behaviour.

Related: #994 (plain-text insertion mode).

Lenguaje dominante
Rust
Estrellas
3.7k
Forks
349
Merge medio
2 d 14 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
97

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de Open-Less/openless

Todos los issues de Open-Less/openless

Issues similares

Más issues de Rust

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.