[Auth] Certificates and devices
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 20/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Área
- authentication, security
Línea de trabajo
Read the authentication discussion in the linked May 17, 2018 meeting notes and compare the certificate, device identity, and passcode exchange ideas with the Wi-Fi Alliance Device Provisioning Protocol reference. The issue raises several possible approaches but does not identify a specific change or completion criteria, so first establish which proposal the project wants to pursue.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
These comments relate to the authentication discussion of the open screen protocol. In particular I wanted to comment on the devices and their certificate discussion from the last F2F meeting.
There is a discussion in the meeting notes:
an area for exploration, with hardware backed certificates, show device number as trusted information in the UI. we could eventually find a way for trusted manufacturer public keys to incorporated
… another idea that could be explored is generating new certificates when changing the friendly name of the device. it's about the integrity of the information we display to the user
Although the device number from a trusted device is a truth, anybody can produce a cert with any ID as the subject (if there is no root CA then there is no trusted assertion of the key-to-ID binding). If an attacker persuades the client to trust the bogus cert - because the subject matches the known ID of the receiver in the same room, the controller will authenticate with unknown receivers. IDs cannot be proxies for public keys. Perhaps receivers need to have their public keys stamping on the front?
If there is a trusted common root CA and device specific certificate, then TLS almost wins anyway. Authentication of the specific physical device just needs a quick visual test through the channel before any confidential data. (I suppose the equivalent step in SSL is the check that the DNS domain matches the certificate subject)
is there a way for a controller and receiver to agree on the mechanism to use for passcode exchange (e.g, QR code, NFC, or other mechanisms)?
… it could enable the receiver to choose which UI to present
This looks a bit like the Wi-fi alliance device provisioning protocol 1.0 which seems to enable all of these. See https://www.wi-fi.org/discover-wi-fi/specifications
- Lenguaje dominante
- Bikeshed
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 21
- Merge medio
- 5 h 2 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de w3c/openscreenprotocol
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 18/100
w3c/openscreenprotocol#380 ·
-
osp-application
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
w3c/openscreenprotocol#377 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
w3c/openscreenprotocol#376 ·
-
osp-application
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
w3c/openscreenprotocol#375 ·
-
osp-application question
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
w3c/openscreenprotocol#374 ·
Todos los issues de w3c/openscreenprotocol
Issues similares
-
Rate limit the JSON APIAbiertoenhancement good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
samiromer2/Ruby-Consent-Portal#27 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area: security area: tests size: S tests
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
yiisoft/yii2-docker#192 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Server mode OAuth2: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable on every request after re-submitting the OAuth2 login while already logged inPosiblemente ocupada @Rarasinhoo la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
pgadmin-org/pgadmin4#10733 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días