macOS: VS Code Recent Documents can invalidate active vp inode, breaking all shims until reinstall
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- macos, vscode
- Área
- cli, operating-systems
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con el precedente #807 y las rutas de código de XNU referenciadas para la invalidación de firmas de código de vnode. Reproduce la secuencia de macOS usando vp create, code . y los comandos de shim indicados; después, investiga la ruta de recuperación activa de Mach-O y de los shims. Se considera terminado cuando abrir o restaurar rutas de Vite+ en VS Code no deja vp, node, nr ni otros shims inutilizables.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Describe the bug
On macOS, the active Vite+ Mach-O can become permanently invalid for that inode after VS Code rebuilds its Recent Documents list. Once this happens, every Vite+ shim that points to the same binary (vp, node, nr, npm, and others) is killed at exec with:
SIGKILL (Code Signature Invalid)
Reinstalling Vite+ fixes the commands only because the new installation uses a new inode. The original file remains byte-for-byte valid and still passes codesign --verify, but macOS continues to reject execution from its old inode.
This incident happened immediately after vp create, but the evidence below shows that vp create did not overwrite or modify the binary. The invalidation happened after code ., while VS Code/CoreServices was rebuilding bookmarks for Vite+ paths stored in Application Recent Documents.
Why this is actionable in Vite+:
- All Unix shims resolve to one active, ad-hoc/linker-signed
vpMach-O, so one invalidated vnode breaks the whole managed runtime. - There is no non-Mach-O launcher or recovery path capable of replacing/retrying the invalid inode after exec starts failing.
- Vite+ already handles the same macOS inode/code-signature failure class for local bootstrap in #807, but not when the active vnode is invalidated externally.
Expected behavior: opening a project in VS Code, or restoring Vite+ paths from Recent Documents, must not make vp, node, and every other managed command unusable until reinstall/reboot.
I am not currently planning to submit a PR.
Reproduction
No project repository is needed — this is a machine-level Vite+ shim failure. The observed shell sequence and preserved runtime evidence are below.
Steps to reproduce
Observed stateful sequence:
-
Use Vite+ v0.2.4 on macOS 26.5.2 arm64.
-
Have Vite+ shim paths in VS Code's recent documents. On this machine, these had previously been opened:
code "$HOME/.vite-plus/bin/trellis" code "$HOME/.vite-plus/bin/"VS Code's persisted
com.microsoft.vscode.sfl4resolved entries included:$HOME/.vite-plus $HOME/.vite-plus/0.2.4 -
Create a library and open it:
vp create cd fe-qualitiy-share code . -
Run any Vite+ shim:
vp --version node -v nr -
Each process is terminated by
SIGKILL (Code Signature Invalid).
Important control: the same old vp inode executed successfully after vp create completed. It only became invalid during the subsequent VS Code Recent Documents rebuild.
The trigger depends on persisted VS Code/macOS Recent Documents state, so a clean-machine reproduction may first require seeding those Vite+ paths.
System Info
The global CLI was reinstalled to recover the shell. The affected v0.2.4 binary and inode are still preserved. Current full output:
$ vp env current
Environment:
Version 24.18.0
Source lts
Tool Paths:
node /Users/jacobzha/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/bin/node
npm /Users/jacobzha/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/bin/npm
npx /Users/jacobzha/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/bin/npx
Package Manager:
Name pnpm
Version 11.17.0
Source devEngines.packageManager
Source Path /Users/jacobzha/Documents/workspace/jacob-open-source/fe-qualitiy-share/package.json
Project Root /Users/jacobzha/Documents/workspace/jacob-open-source/fe-qualitiy-share
Bin Path /Users/jacobzha/.vite-plus/package_manager/pnpm/11.17.0/pnpm/bin/pnpm
$ vp --version
vp v0.2.6
Local vite-plus:
vite-plus v0.2.4
Tools:
vite v8.1.3
rolldown v1.1.4
vitest v4.1.10
oxfmt v0.57.0
oxlint v1.72.0
oxlint-tsgolint v0.24.0
tsdown v0.22.3
Environment:
Package manager pnpm v11.17.0
Node.js v24.18.0
$ sw_vers
ProductName: macOS
ProductVersion: 26.5.2
BuildVersion: 25F84
$ uname -m
arm64
$ code --version
1.130.0
1b6a188127eeaf9194f945eb6eb89a657e93c54c
arm64
Affected global runtime:
vp v0.2.4
Mach-O thin arm64
UUID AE58E66B-8D3B-33C0-9AB1-F031C072C9C6
Used Package Manager
pnpm
Logs
Exact timeline:
10:28:32 vp create
10:29:39 the same old vp inode still executes successfully
10:29:46 code .
10:29:48.831 Code[44880:c85e7] CFURLCreateBookmarkData
10:29:48.831 kernel[0:c85e7] Invalidated flags, old 20020003 new 20020002
10:29:48.832 Code[44880:c85e7] inserts Recent Documents item
0F6552C6-674C-43E5-9EC6-A931997E96F6
10:29:49.616 kernel load_code_signature:
embedded signature doesn't match attached signature
10:29:49.616 kernel proc 44950:
load code signature error 2 for file "vp"
10:29:50.776 the user's nr invocation fails with the same error
The persisted VS Code Recent Documents archive maps item 0F6552C6-674C-43E5-9EC6-A931997E96F6 to:
/Users/jacobzha/.vite-plus/0.2.4
The kernel and VS Code entries have the same thread ID (c85e7). This was the only Invalidated flags event between 10:20 and 10:45. Every subsequent signature-load failure named vp.
The flags precisely show CS_VALID being cleared:
old 0x20020003:
CS_SIGNED 0x20000000
CS_LINKER_SIGNED 0x00020000
CS_ADHOC 0x00000002
CS_VALID 0x00000001
new 0x20020002:
CS_VALID removed
This matches the binary:
$ codesign -dvvv ~/.vite-plus/0.2.4/bin/vp
CodeDirectory v=20400 ... flags=0x20002(adhoc,linker-signed)
Signature=adhoc
Disk evidence:
path /Users/jacobzha/.vite-plus/0.2.4/bin/vp
inode 280661373
size 8404640
birth 2026-07-16 11:50:46
mtime 2026-07-16 11:50:46
ctime 2026-07-16 11:50:46
sha256 c372d2c2da14b1e2086a4965ced59359616d885501426669c07c244c7d854273
The whole ~/.vite-plus/0.2.4 tree had no ctime/mtime change during the incident. vp create only installed pnpm under:
~/.vite-plus/package_manager/pnpm/11.17.0
Decisive copy experiment:
original old inode:
codesign --verify --deep --strict -> valid
execution -> SIGKILL / exit 137
plain cp to a new inode:
identical SHA256
identical embedded signature
codesign --verify --deep --strict -> valid
execution -> vp v0.2.4 / exit 0
This matches XNU behavior:
csvnode_invalidate_flags()clearsCS_VALIDwhen a vnode may have been modified:
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/blob/main/bsd/kern/kern_cs.c#L494-L545- XNU refuses to revalidate an invalidated blob and explicitly says to reboot or create a new file:
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/blob/main/bsd/kern/ubc_subr.c#L5586-L5591 load_code_signature()emits the observed generic mismatch when an attached blob has lostCS_VALID:
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/blob/main/bsd/kern/mach_loader.c#L3565-L3581
Related Vite+ precedent:
- #807: https://github.com/voidzero-dev/vite-plus/pull/807
- Commit message:
fix: use timestamped local-dev dirs to avoid SIGKILL on macOS - It documents the same stale inode/code-signature mechanism for an in-place local bootstrap overwrite. v0.2.4 already contains that fix; the
vp create vite:librarycall graph does not reach bootstrap, upgrade, installer, shim refresh, or any writer of the active Mach-O.
Validations
- Read the Contributing Guidelines.
- Check that there isn't already an issue for the same bug.
- Confirm this is a Vite+ issue and not an upstream issue (Vite, Vitest, tsdown, Rolldown, or Oxc).
- The provided reproduction is a minimal reproducible example.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 6k
- Forks
- 274
- Merge medio
- 1 d 11 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 206
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de voidzero-dev/vite-plus
-
`npx --package=vite-plus vp create` fails with exit 127 when npm is the chosen package managerAbiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2970 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
pending triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2882 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2097 · 10 comentarios · 2 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Windows: PowerShell installer (1.1.0) does not add vite-plus\bin to user PATH — 'vp' not recognizedAbierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2984 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
pending triage
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 40/100
voidzero-dev/vite-plus#2983 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de voidzero-dev/vite-plus
Issues similares
-
[Bug]: Web chat input doesn't regain focus after a reply finishesPosiblemente ocupada @GaijinSystems la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11658 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
good first issue help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
bytecodealliance/wasm-tools#2768 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
NuSkooler/enigma-bbs#907 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día