Repeated peer confirmation and kernelisation messages
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 15/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- linux, perl
- Área
- audio-video-rtc, networking
Línea de trabajo
Start by grepping the rtpengine daemon source for the two log strings quoted in the payload, 'Confirmed peer address' and 'Kernelizing media stream', to find the confirm and kernelisation paths in the media-stream core. Reproduce with a single offer/answer and verbose logging (the reporter confirmed no re-invites and no duplicate iptables -j RTPENGINE rules), then trace why the same peer/port pair re-confirms hundreds of times. Done when one media stream kernelises once and the repeated INFO lines stop.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
In mr11.2.1.5 on kernel 4.18.0-425.10.1.el8_7.x86_64, on some calls, we are seeing hundreds of messages like this from rtpengine logs, essentially instantaneously:
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as x.x.x.x:28202
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as x.x.x.x:28202
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as x.x.x.x:28202
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as x.x.x.x:28202
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as x.x.x.x:28202
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Kernelizing media stream: y.y.y.y:39412
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 43562]: [core] Confirmed peer address as x.x.x.x:28202
Mar 21 20:18:18 rtp-relay rtpengine[1237]: INFO: [SDgmmb201-ed3883e83407be71a657612939715d49-v300g00 port 54928]: [core] Confirmed peer address as z.z.z.z:52108
On this call, it was 400+.
I confirmed via wire protocol trace that there was only a single offer, answer and delete command, so no re-invites. There's nothing unusual about the SDP, it's as banal as can be.
Offer:
v=0
o=Sonus_UAC 20105 5717 IN IP4 y.y.y.y
s=SIP Media Capabilities
c=IN IP4 y.y.y.y
t=0 0
m=audio 39412 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=sendrecv
a=maxptime:20
Answer:
v=0
o=xxx 1679377785 1679377786 IN IP4 z.z.z.z
s=xxx
c=IN IP4 10.100.153.236
t=0 0
m=audio 52108 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=ptime:20
a=rtcp:52109 IN IP4 z.z.z.z
I cannot find any correlation between any SDP attributes and this phenomenon occurring.
I also checked to make sure there were no duplicate -j RTPENGINE rules in the INPUT chain; there are not.
Would appreciate any insight into the cause of this!
- Lenguaje dominante
- Perl
- Estrellas
- 992
- Forks
- 459
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de sipwise/rtpengine
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
HTTP/WS worker threads spin forever in `__websocket_write_done()` (`sched_yield` loop) — 100% CPU with `--listen-http`Posiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertobug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 15/100
sipwise/rtpengine#2197 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Kernel NULL pointer dereference in target_put() during target deletionPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertobug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
sipwise/rtpengine#2190 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Calls using a third logical interface are silently never written to Redis (breaks keyspace-notification HA)Posiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
sipwise/rtpengine#2181 · 4 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
sipwise/rtpengine#2162 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Todos los issues de sipwise/rtpengine
Issues similares
-
Add .gitattributes so share/skel keeps LF on a Windows git checkoutPosiblemente ocupada @sadhana-s-codez la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
PerlDancer/Dancer2#1854 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
major/MySQLTuner-perl#1007 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 69/100
bioconda/bioconda-recipes#70187 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días