AI-generated: macsima() uses the OME plane positions as pixel padding widths, truncated
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
Línea de trabajo
Empieza en src/spatialdata_io/readers/macsima.py, en _get_translations(), y después lee MultiChannelImage._pad_images() y test_get_translations_returns_correct_values; revisa readers/_utils/_utils.py para consultar la búsqueda existente del tamaño físico. Confirma con los maintainers o con datos reales de MACSima si las posiciones de los planos son desplazamientos en píxeles o longitudes físicas, y después añade una prueba de regresión o basada en datos que cubra la interpretación seleccionada y el comportamiento del padding redondeado.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
[!NOTE]
AI-generated issue, opened from #418 and not verified against real MACSima data. The
code pointers are accurate; the question at the end needs someone who knows what the
MACSima software writes into these fields.
What the code does
_get_translations() reads the position of the first plane of the OME metadata and turns it
into an integer — src/spatialdata_io/readers/macsima.py:
translations = {"translation_x": int(position_x), "translation_y": int(position_y)}
The values end up on ChannelMetadata.translation_x / translation_y and are consumed by
MultiChannelImage._pad_images(), which normalises them against their minimum and uses the
result directly as da.pad widths, i.e. as a number of pixels:
normalized_translations_x = [metadata.translation_x - min_translation_x for metadata in channel_metadata]
...
pad_width = ((0, 0), (pad_y_prepend, pad_y_append), (pad_x_prepend, pad_x_append))
img = da.pad(img, pad_width, mode="constant", constant_values=0)
Two things look off
1. int() truncates towards zero instead of rounding. int(0.9) == 0 and
int(-0.9) == 0, so a plane at x = 10.7 is placed at 10 and the direction of the error
depends on the sign of the position. After the normalisation against the minimum the residual
is below one pixel per channel, so this alone is minor — round() would halve the worst case
and make it sign-symmetric.
2. The positions are physical coordinates, but they are used as pixel counts. In OME,
Plane.position_x comes with a Plane.position_x_unit, and Pixels.physical_size_x gives the
size of a pixel in the same kind of unit (17.0 µm in the OMAP test data). Nothing in the
reader converts between the two, so if a MACSima file writes stage positions in micrometres the
padding is off by the pixel size — a factor of 17 for these datasets — rather than by a fraction
of a pixel. If instead the software writes pixel offsets there (position_x_unit is
REFERENCEFRAME, the OME default, i.e. unspecified, in the files I looked at), the current code
is right and only point 1 applies.
Both small test datasets (OMAP10_small, OMAP23_small) have position_x = None on every
plane, so _get_translations() returns (0, 0) there and this path is exercised by unit tests
only, never by the data-based ones.
What a fix would entail
Depending on the answer to "what unit does MACSima write":
- if the positions are already in pixels: replace
int(...)withround(...)in
_get_translations()and extendtest_get_translations_returns_correct_valueswith a
fractional case (e.g.position_x=10.7, position_y=0.9→{"translation_x": 11, "translation_y": 1}); - if they are physical lengths: read
position_x_unit/position_y_unitand
Pixels.physical_size_x/physical_size_yalongside the positions, convert to pixels
(ome_typesexposes the unit enums;parse_physical_size()in
readers/_utils/_utils.pyalready does this kind of lookup for the physical size), and round
at the end._get_translations()currently only receives theOMEobject, which is enough for
both.ChannelMetadata.translation_xstays anint, so_pad_images()is unaffected. - either way, it would be good to have a data-based test: none of the datasets currently in CI
has plane positions, so this would need either a file with real positions or a synthetic TIFF
written withtifffile.imwrite(..., metadata={...})in the style of
test_images_with_invalid_ome_metadata_are_excluded.
Context
#418 originally rounded the positions as part of fixing the regressions from #411, but that
changes reader output on a point nobody has confirmed, so it was pulled out of the PR and filed
here instead. The current behaviour on main is unchanged: truncation.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 103
- Forks
- 65
- Merge medio
- 1 h 8 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 3
Preparar el entorno
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de scverse/spatialdata-io
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
scverse/spatialdata-io#161 · 13 comentarios ·
-
bug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 58/100
scverse/spatialdata-io#422 ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
scverse/spatialdata-io#409 · 1 reacción ·
-
Visium in matrix market formatAbierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
scverse/spatialdata-io#408 ·
-
xenium
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
scverse/spatialdata-io#407 ·
Todos los issues de scverse/spatialdata-io
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
kornia/kornia#5263 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Metadata correction for W16-5400Abiertoapproved correction metadata
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
acl-org/acl-anthology#10133 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
BasedHardware/omi#20084 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug needs-acceptance wg/evaluation-quality
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
vllm-project/semantic-router#4424 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día