[iOS][Fabric] Changing Dynamic Type while the app is running does not re-lay out text (root not dirtied on a layout-context-only change)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with RootShadowNode.cpp and inspect RootShadowNode::clone, then follow layoutContext into YogaLayoutableShadowNode::configureYogaTree. The issue identifies the three layout-context inputs that need to trigger layout dirtiness and explains why comparing the full context would be too broad. Reproduce the Dynamic Type change on iOS with the New Architecture, then verify existing layout tests cover the context changes and that text relays out after the change.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Description
On iOS with the New Architecture, changing the system text size (Dynamic Type) while the app is running has no visible effect on text already on screen. React Native receives the new fontSizeMultiplier, but no layout pass runs, so text keeps its launch-time size until the app is restarted. Text mounted after the change can pick up the new size, which produces mixed layouts.
Steps to reproduce
- Build a Release app with React Native 0.88.1 (New Architecture) and any
<Text>that hasallowFontScalingleft at its default. - Launch it on an iOS simulator or device.
- Without closing the app, change the text size (Settings › Display & Brightness › Text Size, or on a simulator
xcrun simctl ui <udid> content_size accessibility-extra-large). - Return to the app.
Expected: text re-lays out at the new size.
Actual: nothing changes, in either direction. Relaunching renders the new size correctly.
Root cause
-
RCTFabricSurfacehandlesUIContentSizeCategoryDidChangeNotificationby calling_updateLayoutContextwith the newfontSizeMultiplier, which reachesSurfaceHandler::constraintLayout. That commitsRootShadowNode::clone(propsParserContext, layoutConstraints, layoutContext). -
RootShadowNode::cloneonly callsdirtyLayout()when the layout constraints change:if (layoutConstraints != getConcreteProps().layoutConstraints) { newRootShadowNode->dirtyLayout(); } -
For a layout-context-only change, the root stays clean.
RootShadowNode::layoutIfNeededthen returns early (getIsLayoutClean()), solayoutTree→configureYogaTreenever runs. -
That means the existing font-scale handling in
YogaLayoutableShadowNode::configureYogaTreenever gets a chance to run, even thoughenableFontScaleChangesUpdatingLayoutdefaults totrue. That code marks measurable nodes dirty when theirfontSizeMultiplierdiffers from the new one. -
pointScaleFactorandswapLeftAndRightInRTLare consumed byconfigureYogaTreein the same way, so a change to either alone has the same problem.
The same code is on main as of 2026-11-10 (RootShadowNode.cpp last changed in 178c30d7ac). #59285 makes ParagraphShadowNode drop content built for another fontSizeMultiplier, but that only helps once a layout pass actually runs.
Proposed fix
Dirty the root when any layout-context input that configureYogaTree consumes changes:
- if (layoutConstraints != getConcreteProps().layoutConstraints) {
+ const auto& previousContext = getConcreteProps().layoutContext;
+ if (layoutConstraints != getConcreteProps().layoutConstraints ||
+ layoutContext.fontSizeMultiplier != previousContext.fontSizeMultiplier ||
+ layoutContext.pointScaleFactor != previousContext.pointScaleFactor ||
+ layoutContext.swapLeftAndRightInRTL !=
+ previousContext.swapLeftAndRightInRTL) {
newRootShadowNode->dirtyLayout();
}
The full LayoutContext == is deliberately not used: it also compares affectedNodes (a per-pass pointer) and the viewport fields, which would dirty the root on unrelated commits.
I traced this in source and reproduced the symptom in a Release build. I have not run the patched build myself, because our app uses the prebuilt React Native core.
Versions
React Native 0.88.1 (also present on 0.88-stable and main), Expo SDK 58, iOS 26.5 simulator, New Architecture, Hermes.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C++
- Estrellas
- 127k
- Forks
- 25.5k
- Merge medio
- 3 d 18 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 188
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de react/react-native
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
react/react-native#59945 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
react/react-native#59944 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
react/react-native#59942 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
react/react-native#59939 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
react/react-native#59929 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Todos los issues de react/react-native
Issues similares
-
test(tools): two testkit cache tests fail unless GOCACHE and GOMODCACHE are in the environmentAbiertobacklog
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
EchoTools/nevr-runtime#2385 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
type:bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
tensorflow/tflite-micro#3995 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
CPU update 1.31xAbiertospeed-report
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
mw00/project-maya#961 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
not for AI lovers
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
OSGeo/gdal#15515 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día