A heartbeat that blocks forever is never detected, unlike one that fails
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- postgresql, ruby
- Área
- backend, databases, distributed-systems
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading SolidQueue::Process#heartbeat and launch_heartbeat, then inspect Supervisor::Maintenance#launch_maintenance_task and supervise. Compare how blocked heartbeat and maintenance tasks behave with the current termination checks. Done requires an agreed approach that detects or prevents indefinitely blocked work, including the supervisor behavior or documented database socket configuration described in the issue.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
(Written by Claude on @julik's behalf)
Follow-up to #763, which I filed and which was closed as completed by #778. #778 fixes the case I could reproduce at the time; this is the neighbouring case, which I have now hit in production and which I believe is still open.
The distinction
#778 stops a process whose heartbeats keep failing:
def heartbeat
process&.heartbeat
rescue ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound
stop_to_be_replaced
rescue => error
stop_to_be_replaced if presumed_dead?
raise error
end
Both new paths hang off a raise. But a heartbeat can also never return at all, and then neither branch is reachable.
SolidQueue::Process#heartbeat does a real round-trip:
restore_attributes
with_lock { touch(:last_heartbeat_at) }
If the socket under that connection is half-open - the server process is alive enough for its kernel to keep the connection, but nothing is being served - the thread blocks in the driver indefinitely. No exception is raised, so presumed_dead? is never evaluated.
Why the timer does not save you
launch_heartbeat runs the heartbeat inside a Concurrent::TimerTask. In concurrent-ruby (checked against 1.3.7), execute_task is:
_success, value, reason = @task.execute(self)
if completion.try?
self.value = value
schedule_next_task(calculate_next_interval(start_time))
...
observers.notify_observers { [time, self.value, reason] }
The reschedule and the observer notification both happen after the task returns. A run that never returns is never rescheduled and never reported - the heartbeat thread goes quiet permanently, having neither succeeded nor failed.
There is also no configuration escape: TimerTask#timeout_interval is now a no-op that warns "TimerTask timeouts are now ignored as these were not able to be implemented correctly".
The supervisor has the same property
This is the part I think is most worth looking at. Supervisor::Maintenance#launch_maintenance_task is also a Concurrent::TimerTask, running prune_dead_processes. So when a supervisor's maintenance run blocks on the same unresponsive database, pruning stops too - the mechanism meant to notice dead processes is built from the same material that just died.
Meanwhile supervise only calls check_and_replace_terminated_processes, so a forked child that blocks without exiting is never replaced. Between the three, a process can be alive, registered, holding claimed executions, and doing nothing whatsoever, with nothing in the system positioned to notice.
What it looked like in production
A PgBouncer instance in front of our Postgres froze without dying - process alive, event loop wedged, kernel holding every TCP connection half-open. Our scheduler's heartbeat thread blocked mid-with_lock and stayed there. The recurring scheduler runs in exactly one process, so all 33 recurring tasks stopped for 101 minutes and only came back on a manual redeploy. The supervisor never replaced the child; other supervisors pruned the process row but pruning sends no signal, so it kept claiming jobs and those claims later failed as ProcessMissingError.
Left alone, the sockets would have cleared on Linux's default 7200s keepalive - about 2h11m.
What actually fixed it for us, and why I am not sure it is your problem
Setting client-side socket bounds in database.yml:
keepalives: 1
keepalives_idle: 30
keepalives_interval: 10
keepalives_count: 3
tcp_user_timeout: 60000
connect_timeout: 5
tcp_user_timeout is the load-bearing one - TCP keepalive only probes a socket with no unacknowledged data in flight, which is the wrong half of the problem. With it, the block becomes a raise after ~60s, and #778's logic then engages exactly as designed.
So one defensible answer is "this is a libpq configuration problem, document it and close". I would understand that. What makes me file anyway:
- The gap is invisible. An app with default
database.ymlhas no socket bound, and nothing in SolidQueue's own supervision will notice, so the failure mode is a silent stop rather than a loud one. - It is not Postgres-specific. Any adapter whose socket can go quiet has the same shape.
- The supervisor's maintenance task sharing the defect seems worth fixing regardless of what the app does with its sockets.
Possible directions
Not a proposal, just what seems available:
- Track the last time a heartbeat completed in memory, separately from
last_heartbeat_at, and have the run loop stop the process when that goes older thanprocess_alive_threshold. This is the only option that does not depend on the blocked thread itself. - Have supervisors act on prunable children rather than only on exited ones - prune currently deletes the row and sends nothing.
- At minimum, README guidance on socket-level timeouts for the database connection, since without one nothing else here can engage.
Happy to have a go at (1) if you think it is the right shape.
Refs
- #763 - Scheduler becomes an un-replaced zombie after host sleep/resume (mine, closed by #778)
- #778 - Stop processes whose heartbeats keep failing past the alive threshold (merged 2026-08-22, after v1.7.0 was cut, unreleased at time of writing)
- #751 - Supervisor remains alive with missing worker process; due scheduled jobs stop being dispatched
- #760 - Replace forked processes that fail to boot (covers stalling during startup, not after)
- #781 / #791 - Replace terminated forks/threads even if releasing claimed jobs fails
- #788 - Retry finalizing claimed executions on transient errors (open)
- #716 - the earlier nil-process heartbeat fix
Versions: solid_queue 1.6.0, concurrent-ruby 1.3.7, Ruby 3.4.2, PostgreSQL via PgBouncer in transaction mode.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Ruby
- Estrellas
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 252
- Merge medio
- 8 h 31 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 5
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de rails/solid_queue
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
rails/solid_queue#806 ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
rails/solid_queue#805 ·
-
limits_concurrency on_conflict: :discard looking only into running jobs and not blocked jobsAbierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
rails/solid_queue#804 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
rails/solid_queue#802 ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
rails/solid_queue#797 ·
Todos los issues de rails/solid_queue
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
jetrockets/jet_ui#47 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
FreeCAD/homebrew-freecad#870 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día