[Bug]: Timeline jumps far up right after sending in a long thread
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@santiago-ramos-02 ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 25/9/2026.
- #13707 de @santiago-ramos-02 — abierto
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 82/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- frontend, performance, web-dev
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con patches/@[email protected] y sigue la comprobación de tamaño de prepareMVCP a través de getItemSize, setSize y addTotalSize. Usa la reproducción independiente de LegendList descrita en el issue para verificar el salto y, después, confirma que eliminar la última fila durante un desplazamiento animado ya no colapsa la lista ni la mueve cerca de la parte superior.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Before submitting
- I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
- I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area
apps/web
Steps to reproduce
In the app it is timing dependent. It shows up most in long threads with long replies, especially on desktop with a busy main thread:
- Open a thread with a lot of history and long assistant replies, scrolled to the bottom.
- Send a message.
- About half a second later the timeline jumps far up, often near the top of the loaded history, and stays there.
A small page that renders only a LegendList (no T3 Code components or data), served by the apps/web dev server, reproduces it every time:
- Render a
LegendListwith 150 rows of about 900px each,estimatedItemSize={90},initialScrollAtEnd, andmaintainVisibleContentPosition={{ data: true, size: true }}(the timeline's options). - Scroll up a few screens.
- Call
listRef.current.scrollToEnd({ animated: true }). - While that scroll is running, remove the last row from
data.
Expected behavior
The list ends at the end, with 149 rows.
Actual behavior
The list lands on rows 0 and 1, about 25,000px from the end. The same steps without step 4 end at the end. Removing the last row without a scroll in flight keeps the position.
The same page reproduces in a separate plain app with pristine npm @legendapp/list 3.3.5, when built with Rolldown-based Vite (apps/web builds with Rolldown through vite-plus). With esbuild-based Vite it does not jump. Under the same Rolldown setup, 3.4.0 does not jump either.
Impact
Major degradation or frequent failure
Version or commit
main @ ed809f7ad2 (@legendapp/list 3.3.5 with T3 Code's patch). @legendapp/list 3.4.0 does not reproduce. Its changelog lists "End-following and animated programmatic scrolling now stay aligned through footer, viewport, and native layout changes."
Environment
Windows 11, desktop nightly and web client from vp run dev. Provider independent. The same code is in the React Native build that mobile uses.
Logs or stack traces
No errors. Reading listRef.current.getState() every frame during a jump in a long thread:
| Time after send | scroll |
contentLength |
Rows in data |
Rendered rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| before | 12,414 | 13,162 | 144 | 131 to 143 |
| 631 ms | 0 | 334 | 143 | 131 to 142 |
| 1,047 ms | 12,158 | 49,291 | 143 | 36 to 39 |
The element's scrollTop stayed about where it was the whole time; only LegendList's state reset. The row data never went empty. A totalSize listener caught the collapse. Its stack runs through checkResetContainers, calculateItemsInView, the MVCP check, getItemSize, setSize, and addTotalSize.
Screenshots, recordings, or supporting files
The standalone repro, unpatched:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22c266c7-1763-42e4-ae23-851b2de6cc01
Workaround
Press End or use "Scroll to end".
Cause
scrollToEnd records the last index as state.scrollingTo. When data shrinks before that scroll completes, the MVCP check in prepareMVCP resolves the target with getId(state, scrollTarget). That index is now past the end of data, so it returns null. The check still sizes it:
if (scrollingToViewPosition && scrollingToViewPosition > 0) {
const newSize = getItemSize(ctx, targetId, scrollTarget, state.props.data[scrollTarget]);
getItemSize passes the null key to setSize, and addTotalSize treats a null key as "set the total to this value". The total height collapses to one estimated row. That sends the list to scroll = 0 and it re-lays out unmeasured rows at the average measured row height. In a thread of long replies that average is several times the 90px estimate, so the old offset now lands near the top.
In T3 Code the shrink comes from the timeline's trailing rows. When a turn starts, the live activity row at the end is replaced, which briefly removes one row while the send's scrollToEnd is still in flight. A busy main thread widens that window. The desktop running-thread keep-alive and very large environments made it frequent here, but neither is required.
Skipping that size check when targetId is null fixes the repro. I'll open a PR that adds the guard to patches/@[email protected].
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 24.8k
- Forks
- 6.4k
- Merge medio
- 2 h 58 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 480
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de pingdotgg/t3code
-
accepted bug via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 69/100
pingdotgg/t3code#20931 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
pingdotgg/t3code#20128 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: T3_CODE_ORCHESTRATION_INSTRUCTIONS has no carve-out for user- or repo-mandated CLI review workflows (unlike T3_CODE_BROWSER_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS)Posiblemente ocupada @nivethass15102007-tech la tomó hace 2 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
pingdotgg/t3code#19908 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
accepted bug via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
pingdotgg/t3code#19536 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de pingdotgg/t3code
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
chrisparsons83/flexspotff#215 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
vitest-dev/vitest#11633 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día