Supported path for CSI drivers that need a node DaemonSet

Abierto
#3,056 4 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
go, kubernetes
Área
backend, devops

Línea de trabajo

Read the registry+v1 validator at internal/operator-controller/rukpak/render/registryv1/validators/validator.go#L355-L364 and the supported resource list in operator-registry/pkg/lib/bundle/supported_resources.go#L33-L56, then review draft PR #3057 and discussion #2992. The issue asks maintainers to choose a supported direction for CSI DaemonSets, so clarify the v1 bundle and compatibility design before implementation.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

CSI drivers usually ship a controller Deployment and a node plugin DaemonSet. In registry+v1 the Deployment fits the CSV, but the renderer rejects the DaemonSet through operator-registry's supported kinds. So CSI operators create it at runtime from their own controller; I could not find a certified or community bundle that ships one.

I asked about this in 2023 on the closed #1022 and in discussion #2992. Since then the experimental Helm chart gate was removed (#2798) and the next bundle format is still open, so I would like to know the supported path in OLM v1 for a CSI driver that needs a node DaemonSet.

One option I tried, in draft PR #3057: an Alpha gate, off by default, that lets the registry+v1 renderer accept a DaemonSet with the alpha BoxcutterRuntime, plus a DaemonSet progression probe. It is about 50 lines of production code and does not touch operator-registry. OLM v0 cannot use such a bundle: opm accepts it into a catalog, but on install v0 creates the CSV, skips the DaemonSet as unsupported and fails the InstallPlan, leaving the operator half installed. So a bundle that uses the gate is v1 only, and nodeSelector and tolerations through spec.config are not covered yet. Is a gate like this a direction you would consider for v1, or should CSI operators keep creating the DaemonSet from their controller until the next bundle format?

Lenguaje dominante
Go
Estrellas
215
Forks
86
Merge medio
1 d 6 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
124

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de operator-framework/operator-controller

Todos los issues de operator-framework/operator-controller

Issues similares

Más issues de Go

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.