Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Using a Condition to test if dependencies are met

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#3,643 3 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
62/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
java, kubernetes
Área
backend

Línea de trabajo

Start from the @Dependent annotation and the code that interprets dependsOn and reconcilePrecondition (io.javaoperatorsdk.operator.processing.dependent.* and the Condition interface) to see where deletion on a false precondition is triggered. Design where the new dependenciesMetPrecondition option would be evaluated in the reconcile cycle so it gates work without deleting an existing secondary resource, and decide how it interacts with dependsOn. Done looks like: the new option is honored during ongoing reconcile cycles, existing precondition deletion behavior is unchanged, and unit/integration tests around dependent resources pass.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, we can describe a resource's dependencies using their names in dependsOn and we can also test preconditions with a reconcilePrecondition. However, sometimes a resource may need to depend one "at least one of" some other resource. For example, either an Ingress or a Route depending on the underlying cluster. In this case, dependsOn is not possible and a reconcilePrecondition returning false would delete the resource, which is undesirable for ongoing reconcile cycles.

There could also be cases where, for example, downstream dependents need a generated Route's hostname, but do not depend on the route actually becoming ready for further processing of the workflow, etc. Using a Condition could allow dependencies on sub-resources and not only on a resource's full readiness.

Describe the solution you'd like
An additional option on @Dependent (such as dependenciesMetPrecondition) that would allow programmatic checking on dependencies without removal of an existing secondary resource if it exists. This could be either mutually exclusive with, or in addition to whatever is given in dependsOn. Allowing both would provide a way to test simple dependencies and more complex ones at the same time.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I think more complicated workflows with "virtual" resources (always returning ReconcileResult.noOperation(primary) from reconcile) together with a readyPostcondition could be made to behave similarly, but with the burden of additional code and dependencies in the @Workflow.

Additional context
N/A

Lenguaje dominante
Java
Estrellas
942
Forks
246
Merge medio
1 d 11 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
28

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de operator-framework/java-operator-sdk

Todos los issues de operator-framework/java-operator-sdk

Issues similares

Más issues de Java

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.