[Bug] Generated Dataverse delete() discards IOperationResult, so failed deletes are silent
@ergonza93 ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 1/10/2026.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.
Descripción
Describe the bug
For Dataverse tables, the generated service's delete() method is typed Promise<void> and discards the IOperationResult<void> that client.deleteRecordAsync returns. deleteRecordAsync reports failure through success: false and error instead of throwing, so when Dataverse refuses a delete the failure is silently lost and callers cannot tell the delete did not happen.
create, update and get in the same generated file all return result, so only delete is inconsistent.
Generated code today:
public static async delete(id: string): Promise<void> {
await Contoso_projectsService.client.deleteRecordAsync(
Contoso_projectsService.dataSourceName,
id);
}
The generator template is in @microsoft/power-apps-cli (the Dataverse service generator): the delete template emits await ...deleteRecordAsync(...) with no return, unlike the update template.
Steps to Reproduce
- Create a code app with Dataverse tables where a parent table has a Restrict-delete relationship to a child table (e.g.
contoso_project->contoso_task, with the child's lookup to the parent set to "Restrict" on delete). - Add both tables with
pa app add data-source --connector dataverse --table <name>. - Create a parent row and a child row that references it.
- Call
Contoso_projectsService.delete(parentId)from the app. - Observe: the promise resolves normally, nothing is thrown, and the parent row still exists in Dataverse.
Expected behavior
delete should surface the failure the same way the other operations do: return Promise<IOperationResult<void>> (so callers can check success and error), or throw when success is false.
Actual behavior
delete resolves with undefined regardless of outcome. The error is discarded inside the generated wrapper, so UIs behave as if the delete succeeded.
Screenshots or Error Messages
None: the point of the bug is that no error is surfaced. Calling the client directly and checking the result does show the failure:
const result = await client.deleteRecordAsync('contoso_projects', id);
// result.success === false, result.error.message describes the blocked delete
Environment information
- Framework, build tool or relevant package used: React 19, Vite 7,
@microsoft/power-apps1.2.12 (also type-checked against 1.5.0),@microsoft/power-apps-cli0.15.2 (also inspected 1.2.0),@microsoft/power-apps-vite1.0.2 (also 1.0.13) - Any connection/components: Dataverse (generated services via
pa app add data-source/pa app refresh data-source)
Additional context
- The behaviour was observed in an app generated with CLI 0.15.2 / runtime 1.2.12. I then regenerated with CLI 1.2.0 and read the generated output and the runtime 1.5.0 typings:
deleteis stillPromise<void>anddeleteRecordAsyncis still typedPromise<IOperationResult<void>>, so it is not fixed in the latest versions I checked. I did not re-run the repro itself on 1.5.0. - Workaround: bypass the generated
deleteand callgetClient(dataSourcesInfo).deleteRecordAsync(tableName, id)directly, throwing whenresult.successis false. Editing the generated file is not viable because it is overwritten on the next refresh. - Suggested fix: change the
deletetemplate in both the standard andpartitionIdvariants to return the result, e.g.Promise<IOperationResult<void>>andreturn result;, matchingupdate.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 513
- Forks
- 143
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 22/100
microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps#472 ·
-
[Bug] Solution export fails again on 9.2.26091.144 — code app package container missing (404 in GetBlobBytes) for every publish since 2026-09-24 ~08:00 UTC (regression of #464)Posiblemente ocupada @tonystevenj la tomó hace 6 días. Abiertobug product team investigating
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps#467 · 2 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
-
[Bug] shared_odbc with on-prem fails pointing to placeholder URLPosiblemente ocupada @tonystevenj la tomó hace 1 día. Abiertobug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps#465 · 1 asignado ·
-
[Bug] Power App Code App doesn't run in China 21V cloud even with the toggle enabledPosiblemente ocupada @tonystevenj la tomó hace 4 días. Abiertobug product team investigating
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps#463 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
-
bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps#462 ·
Todos los issues de microsoft/PowerAppsCodeApps
Issues similares
-
documentation good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
libredb/libredb-studio#1756 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
state:triage-needed
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#32365 · 1 comentario · 5 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
friction
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
kentcdodds/kody#3706 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
copperheadhq/copperhead#378 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día