[GHSA-xcjm-wqff-m669][CVE-2026-49219] Reassess severity - namespace bypass enables unauthenticated RCE on `--enable-pipes` builds, currently rated Medium (file read only)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Área
- security
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con el aviso GHSA enlazado y la discusión referenciada ImageMagick#6339; no se mencionan archivos ni pruebas del repositorio. Compara la descripción publicada y el CVSS con el impacto de RCE propuesto y la condición previa de compilación, y determina después si el registro del aviso debería revisarse una vez resuelta la disputa sobre la gravedad.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Advisory: https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/security/advisories/GHSA-xcjm-wqff-m669
Current CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N = 5.5 (Medium)
Current description: "An incorrect parsing of the filename can result in a policy bypass and read files disallowed by a security policy using a symlink."
Summary of the disagreement
I am the reporter of this advisory. The published score (AV:L … C:H/I:N/A:N, 5.5 Medium) treats the bug as a local arbitrary-read of disallowed files via symlink. That framing materially understates the impact. The same primitive - ParseNamespace silently splitting attacker-controlled filenames on "::" so that every nameless <policy domain="path" rights="none" pattern="…"/> rule is skipped - also reopens the popen filename-handler sink for builds compiled with --enable-pipes, yielding unauthenticated remote code execution as the ImageMagick process user. I supplied a working PoC for the RCE chain during disclosure.
The maintainer's position is that --enable-pipes is off by default and that enabling it carries documented risk; on that basis they decline to treat the bug as critical and frame the impact as file read only.
My position is that the severity of a policy-enforcement bug must be scored against the deployments that actually rely on that enforcement, not against the default build. --enable-pipes is widely enabled in real deployments (document-conversion pipelines, CI images, certain Windows builders), and those operators followed ImageMagick's own documented mitigation for the |cmd popen handler - the nameless <policy domain="path" rights="none" pattern="|*"/> deny rule recommended by the maintainer in ImageMagick/ImageMagick#6339. This advisory's bug silently nullifies exactly that rule. The result is unauthenticated RCE in deployments whose admins did everything the project told them to do; describing that as "file read via symlink" leaves those operators with a false sense of security and a strong incentive to defer the patch. CVSS 4.0 has a field designed for exactly this situation - Attack Requirements AT:P ("Present") - which encodes the --enable-pipes precondition honestly without erasing the RCE impact.
Why CVSS should reflect RCE, not file-read
-
The bug is in the policy enforcement engine, not in
--enable-pipes.--enable-pipesis a build-time feature; ImageMagick documents the maintainer-recommended mitigation against the|cmdpopen handler as exactly the nameless<policy domain="path" rights="none" pattern="|*"/>deny rule that this advisory's bug silently skips (see the maintainer's response in ImageMagick/ImageMagick#6339). Admins who followed the project's own documented mitigation are exposed. -
CVSS Attack Requirements explicitly model this case. CVSS 4.0
AT:P("Present") is the correct way to express a precondition like "the build was compiled with--enable-pipes." Marking AT:P scores the bug honestly without ignoring that the precondition exists - which is what the maintainer's "disabled by default" objection seems to require. -
The published narrative is incomplete. "read files disallowed by a security policy using a symlink" describes one consequence of the bypass. The same primitive enables
|cmdfilename injection which leads to code execution. Listed CWEs (CWE-22, CWE-78, CWE-200, CWE-863) already acknowledge command injection (CWE-78); the CVSS vector should match.
Proposed corrections
| Field | Current | Proposed |
|---|---|---|
| Description | "read files disallowed by a security policy using a symlink" | "Incorrect parsing of :: in filenames silently bypasses nameless path-deny policies. On --enable-pipes builds this enables unauthenticated remote code execution via the |cmd filename handler in OpenBlob. On all builds, it enables reading paths denied by policy." |
| CVSS 4.0 | - | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N = ~9.2 Critical (AT:P explicitly models the --enable-pipes precondition) |
Why this matters for downstreams
The current Medium / file-read framing is being used by distros and consumers to decide patch urgency. Several stacks ship --enable-pipes enabled (document-conversion pipelines, certain Windows builders, some CI images) and configure the documented |* deny rule. Those deployments are unauthenticated-RCE exposed but, reading this advisory, will believe their exposure is local file-read only - and may rationally choose to defer updating, since arbitrary read with local access is a much lower urgency than unauthenticated remote code execution. That is the consumer harm I am asking the database to correct.
Thanks for considering. Happy to provide the validation Dockerfiles on request.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Merge medio
- 3 d 15 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 46
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/advisory-database
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reacción ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
Todos los issues de github/advisory-database
Issues similares
-
needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
Nmap
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
blocklist removal
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect#296544 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Azure/azure-functions-docker#1257 ·