Testing the feedback tool sends real feedback

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#2,264 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
3/5
Tiempo estimado
1-2 días
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript
Área
api, devtools

Línea de trabajo

Start with the tool definition in packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog/submit-feedback-to-sentry-team.ts, especially the hints around line 73 and the input schema around lines 78-109. Then check packages/mcp-core/src/server.ts near line 405, where the outputSchema is published, and availability.ts lines 123-127, which hide the tool without a DSN. Done means a dry-run input that validates and returns the same response shape without capturing feedback, with the design for the DSN-less case settled first.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

submit_feedback_to_sentry_team has no way to be exercised without capturing a real User Feedback in mcp-server. Its hints say not to call it for testing (packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog/submit-feedback-to-sentry-team.ts:73), but clients that verify the tool or record tool response shapes call it anyway, and every call lands in the feedback inbox.

  • MCP-SERVER-GQ6 (2026-11-14 05:15 UTC): an other-family client (python-httpx) asked for a dry-run flag because "building a faithful client or replica means sending real feedback."
  • The same caller (matched by client IP; no mcp.session.id or user.id was recorded) called ~100 tools between 05:10 and 05:15 UTC while documenting response shapes, including writes like create_team, create_project and update_dsn. It called submit_feedback_to_sentry_team three times in five seconds: one probe rejected for an oversized toolName, then MCP-SERVER-GQ7 (asks to document the result text) and MCP-SERVER-GQ6. Both returned {"feedbackId": ...}.
  • Other test or meta submissions in the last 30 days: MCP-SERVER-GH9 and MCP-SERVER-GHA (2026-10-30, a maintainer checking end-to-end delivery through the hosted connector), MCP-SERVER-GP8 (2026-11-12, feedback about the feedback tool).
  • The tool has no dryRun input (submit-feedback-to-sentry-team.ts:78-109), and no MCP tool in mcp-core has one. Its result shape is already published as outputSchema in tools/list (packages/mcp-core/src/server.ts:405). Locally it can't be used as a sandbox either: it's hidden when Sentry telemetry has no DSN (packages/mcp-core/src/tools/catalog-runtime/availability.ts:123-127).

Proposal from the reporter of MCP-SERVER-GQ6: add a dry-run flag that validates input and returns the response shape without capturing feedback.

via Sentry.

--

View Session [Sentry]

Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
961
Forks
179
Merge medio
15 h 33 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
476

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de getsentry/toolkit

Todos los issues de getsentry/toolkit

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.