[BUG] Bundled PMD 7.25.0 cannot load custom rulesets referencing PMD 7.26.0 rules — one unresolvable ref disables the whole ruleset
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- #480 de @nikhil-mittal-165 — cerrado sin fusionar
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- java, typescript
- Área
- devtools, testing-qa
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con @salesforce/code-analyzer-pmd-engine 0.43.0 y sus jars de PMD en dist/java-lib/, y luego sigue la ruta de carga de la dependencia incluida y del conjunto de reglas personalizado. Reproduce el problema con los archivos proporcionados my-rules.xml, code-analyzer.yml y el comando sf code-analyzer. Se considera terminado cuando la versión de PMD compatible está actualizada y una regla no resoluble informa de la versión incluida sin ocultar silenciosamente el otro comportamiento solicitado.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Description
A custom PMD ruleset that references a standard rule added in PMD 7.26.0 (for example category/apex/errorprone.xml/InvocableClassNoArgConstructor, added 2026-06-29) cannot be loaded by Code Analyzer, because the plugin's bundled PMD engine is still 7.25.0 — and one unresolvable rule reference fails the load of the entire ruleset, so every other rule in the file silently stops running too.
There is currently no way for a user to fix this on their side: the PMD jars ship inside @salesforce/code-analyzer-pmd-engine (dist/java-lib/pmd-apex-7.25.0.jar in engine 0.43.0, the latest) and there is no supported way to point the pmd engine at newer jars.
Steps To Reproduce
(Prerequisites: Salesforce CLI and Java, the standard Code Analyzer requirements. Steps verified end-to-end in an empty directory.)
sf plugins install code-analyzer(installscode-analyzer 5.14.0, the current latest, which resolves@salesforce/[email protected]).- In an empty directory, create
src/Sample.cls:
public class Sample {
public static void log() {
System.debug('hello');
}
}
- Create
my-rules.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ruleset name="Repro"
xmlns="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/ruleset/2.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/ruleset/2.0.0 https://pmd.sourceforge.io/ruleset_2_0_0.xsd">
<description>One rule from PMD 7.26.0 plus one custom XPath rule.</description>
<rule ref="category/apex/errorprone.xml/InvocableClassNoArgConstructor"/>
<rule name="MyOtherRule" language="apex" message="demo"
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.xpath.XPathRule">
<description>demo</description>
<priority>3</priority>
<properties>
<property name="xpath"><value>//MethodCallExpression[lower-case(@FullMethodName) = 'system.debug']</value></property>
</properties>
</rule>
</ruleset>
- Create
code-analyzer.yml:
engines:
pmd:
custom_rulesets:
- my-rules.xml
sf code-analyzer run --workspace src --rule-selector pmd --config-file code-analyzer.yml
Expected Behavior
Either the reference resolves (bundled PMD current with the PMD release line), or at minimum the loadable rules still run and the failure clearly names the unresolvable rule and the bundled PMD version.
Actual Behavior
The pmd engine fails entirely; zero rules from the ruleset execute:
Error: Code Analyzer:
Failed to get rules from engine with name 'pmd' due to the following error:
PMD errored when attempting to load a custom ruleset "my-rules.xml".
Make sure the resource is a valid ruleset file on disk or on the Java classpath.
PMD Exception:
| Cannot load ruleset my-rules.xml: PMD threw an unexpected exception:
| Error at my-rules.xml:7:4
| <rule ref="category/apex/errorprone.xml/InvocableClassNoArgConstructor"/>
| ^^^^^ Unable to find referenced rule InvocableClassNoArgConstructor;
| perhaps the rule name is misspelled?
The run then reports 1 Critical severity violation(s) found across 0 files, which downstream tooling can misread as a code finding.
Control (shows the rest of the ruleset is valid): delete the single <rule ref="category/..."/> line from my-rules.xml and re-run step 5 — the scan now succeeds and pmd:MyOtherRule correctly flags Sample.cls:3. One unresolvable reference is the only difference between "everything runs" and "nothing runs".
Requests
- Bump the bundled PMD in
@salesforce/code-analyzer-pmd-engineto the current PMD release line (7.26.0 shipped 2026-06-29; the all-or-nothing ruleset load is PMD's own semantics, so currency of the bundle is what decides whether a ruleset referencing new standard rules is usable at all). - Improve the diagnostic: when a custom ruleset fails to load over an unresolvable rule reference, state the bundled PMD version in the message (for example "bundled PMD is 7.25.0;
InvocableClassNoArgConstructorrequires 7.26.0+") so users don't debug a "misspelled rule name" that is actually a version gap. (Companion request for the underlying message on the PMD side: pmd/pmd#6865.) - (Nice to have) A documented way to supply or override the PMD version the engine uses.
Workaround
Remove standard-category rule references from custom rulesets (inline the XPath equivalents or run the standalone PMD CLI >= 7.26.0 separately).
Environment
code-analyzerplugin 5.14.0 (latest),@salesforce/code-analyzer-pmd-engine0.43.0 (latest)- Bundled jars:
pmd-apex-7.25.0.jar,pmd-core-7.25.0.jar(indist/java-lib/) - Standalone PMD for comparison: 7.26.0 (2026-06-29)
- macOS 15 / Node 22
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 241
- Forks
- 51
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de forcedotcom/code-analyzer
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
forcedotcom/code-analyzer#2094 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
forcedotcom/code-analyzer#2093 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
forcedotcom/code-analyzer#2091 ·
-
[BUG][code-analyzer] sfge: calling toString() on an enum aborts the entry point (UnimplementedMethodException)Quizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
forcedotcom/code-analyzer#2090 ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
forcedotcom/code-analyzer#2104 ·
Todos los issues de forcedotcom/code-analyzer
Issues similares
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4460 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 77/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
docs(api): openapi.yaml still documents gif-tools optimize colors as 2-256 instead of 2, 4, 16, 256Abiertoarea: backend documentation priority: low
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
snapotter-hq/SnapOtter#2919 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 77/100
obsidianmd/pele#39 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
biomejs/biome#12475 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día