Your Bug title
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
Start with gd_guidl__change_change_request and the referenced Change Management Plan, then review the named issue templates in eclipse-score/.github and the linked example issue #629. The work spans repository labels, templates, process guidance, and the example across multiple repositories. Done when the acceptance criteria are met and all references agree on the templates and how modification types are identified.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Description
Description
The Change Management Plan (doc__platform_change_management_plan) has been aligned with the new
GitHub issue templates, which replaced the former "Change Request" issue template:
Reference process: process_description – change management
The following points cannot be resolved in the plan itself. They need changes to the repository
settings, the issue templates or the process description.
Open points
1. Missing labels in eclipse-score/score
The plan marks the Change Request types (gd_req__change_attr_types) with an issue type plus a label:
| Change Request type | Issue type | Label |
|---|---|---|
| Feature | Feature Request | feature_request |
| Feature Modification | Feature Request | feature_modification |
| Component | Component Request | component_request |
| Component Modification | Component Request | component_modification |
- Create the labels
component_requestandcomponent_modificationin eclipse-score/score.
Onlyfeature_requestandfeature_modificationexist today.
2. Issue templates in eclipse-score/.github
- The description fields of both issue templates tell users to put the
Change Management Decision Record Template in the linked PR. The process_description guideline
(gd_guidl__change_change_request, sections "Templates" and "Create Change Request") requires
gd_temp__change_feature_requestorgd_temp__change_component_request. Decision Records
(gd_temp__change_decision_record) record the decision (e.g. a FEP outcome), not the request.
Link the Feature/Component Request Template instead. - Rename
1b_ComponentenRequest.ymlto1b_ComponentRequest.ymland update all links to it
(e.g. in process_descriptionchange_management_guideline.rst). - Fix the spacing in "Component Request /Modification" so it reads "Component Request / Modification".
- Optional: record the modification variant in the issue itself, either with a
"Request / Modification" dropdown or by applying the*_modificationlabels automatically.
3. Mapping of types in eclipse-score/process_description
-
gd_req__change_attr_typesdefines four types (Feature, Feature Modification, Component,
Component Modification). The GitHub issue templates provide two issue types (Feature Request,
Component Request), each covering both request and modification. Add a note to
gd_guidl__change_change_requestexplaining how the modification variant is identified
(e.g. by label). - Update the Change Request example (eclipse-score/process_description#629), which is referenced
in the guideline, to use the new issue templates.
Acceptance criteria
- The labels used in the Change Management Plan exist in eclipse-score/score.
- The issue templates, process_description and the Change Management Plan reference the same
templates and the same way of identifying Change Request types.
Problem notifications
Notification will be done in the general process community rounds
Analysis results
No response
Solution
No response
Error Occurrence Rate
Single Event
How to reproduce
No response
Supporting Information
No response
Classification
Minor
First Affected Release
0.9
Last Affected Release
not released (main)
Expected Fixed Release
1.0
Category
- Safety Relevant
- Security Relevant
- Lenguaje dominante
- HTML
- Estrellas
- 6
- Forks
- 25
- Merge medio
- 14 h 47 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 35
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de eclipse-score/process_description
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
eclipse-score/process_description#811 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
eclipse-score/process_description#862 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Unify proper reference to standardsPosiblemente ocupada @pahmann la tomó hace 5 días. Abierto
eclipse-score/process_description#861 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Tool Mgt ML3Abierto
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 12/100
eclipse-score/process_description#858 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
eclipse-score/process_description#852 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de eclipse-score/process_description
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
stephrobert/dsoxlab#349 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
objective-see/LuLu#950 ·
-
קישור שבורAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 63/100
nightscout/AndroidAPS#5529 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
stratum-mining/sv2-spec#253 ·
-
Install page: spectarf's CUDA engine fails with PyTorch for CUDA 13.0 (nvvmError: ERROR_INVALID_IR)Posiblemente ocupada @lukepolson la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 79/100
PyTomography/PyTomography#435 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día