git-lfs: signing-key retrieval fails with No data on Debian Trixie
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- debian, git, shell
- Área
- developer-experience, security
Línea de trabajo
Start in src/git-lfs/install.sh, at receive_gpg_keys and the GIT_LFS_ARCHIVE_VERSION_CODENAMES check, which decides between the apt path and the GitHub release path on Trixie. The failure happens when xargs -n 1 gpg --recv-keys exits non-zero because one listed key cannot be fetched. Done means the git-lfs feature installs on a Trixie base image and signature verification is still enforced. Settle the design choice with maintainers before coding.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
The Git LFS feature fails during signing-key retrieval on Debian Trixie, before release signature verification. All retries fail.
Configuration
Minimal configuration extracted from the failing project (not separately rebuilt in isolation):
{
"image": "mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/javascript-node:5-22-trixie",
"features": {
"ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/git-lfs:1": {}
}
}
The lock file resolves the feature to 1.2.5, digest sha256:71c2b371cf12ab7fcec47cf17369c6f59156100dad9abf9e4c593049d789de72.
Build output
gpg: keybox '/tmp/tmp-gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
gpg: key F1BA225C0223B187: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: w/o user IDs: 1
gpg: /tmp/tmp-gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key F54FE648088335A9: public key "Chris Darroch (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
gpg: keyserver receive failed: No data
(*) Failed getting key, retrying in 10s...
Subsequent attempts show the same skipped first key, unchanged second key, and No data failure, ending with:
(!) Failed to get gpg key.
ERROR: Feature "Git Large File Support (LFS)" (ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/git-lfs) failed to install!
Installer observations
In install.sh, Trixie is absent from GIT_LFS_ARCHIVE_VERSION_CODENAMES, so installation uses the GitHub release path. receive_gpg_keys runs every configured checksum key through xargs -n 1 gpg --recv-keys and requires the entire invocation to succeed. An unavailable listed key therefore aborts installation before checksum signature verification, even when another listed key imports successfully.
The log does not establish which keyserver supplied each result or why the final key lookup returned no data. It also does not establish whether the successfully imported key could verify the selected release.
Expected behavior
Git LFS should install on this base image while retaining authenticity verification. Please consider making trusted-key retrieval resilient to an unavailable keyserver entry, or using the distribution's signed package where appropriate. Signature verification should still be required.
The project has been changed to request Debian's git-lfs package through an apt feature, but that replacement has not yet been verified by a full container rebuild.
Related: #1072 also reports missing user IDs, but proceeds to signature verification; this failure stops earlier in key retrieval. #888 reports a different failure after all three keys import.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Shell
- Estrellas
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 626
- Merge medio
- 4 d 10 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 7
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de devcontainers/features
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
devcontainers/features#1776 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
devcontainers/features#1770 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
replica-skillAbierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 5/100
devcontainers/features#1775 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 58/100
devcontainers/features#1772 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
go feature: "init:true" prevents any further use cases that require "init:false", such as running systemd as PID1Posiblemente ocupada @v-Kaniska244 la tomó hace 10 días. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
devcontainers/features#1765 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
Todos los issues de devcontainers/features
Issues similares
-
ci: repo has no GitHub Actions workflow, so pushes and pull requests are never built or testedAbiertoagents area: runtime automation chore cli consistency dependencies developer-experience difficulty: easy documentation enhancement good first issue help wanted hygiene json-output priority: P3 starters tests
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
area:claude-code-web bug has repro platform:linux platform:web
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
anthropics/claude-code#110168 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
btclib-org/portanode#968 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agents area: runtime automation chore cli consistency dependencies developer-experience difficulty: easy documentation enhancement good first issue help wanted hygiene json-output priority: P3 starters tests
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
flisk-sh/flisk-example#41 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día