Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Should we merge Dask HPC Runners in here?

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#638 6 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
20/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
python
Área
distributed-systems, hpc

Línea de trabajo

Empieza leyendo el prototipo enlazado de dask-runners y la discusión en dask/community#346; después, compara los proyectos existentes dask-jobqueue y dask-mpi. Se considera terminado cuando se haya alcanzado una decisión de los maintainers sobre si los runners deben formar parte de dask-jobqueue, dask-mpi, dask-contrib o un paquete combinado, y se haya acordado el alcance de MPIRunner y SlurmRunner.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

For a while I've been playing around with this prototype repo which implements Dask Runners for HPC systems. I'm motivated to reduce the fragmentation and confusion around tooling in the Dask HPC community, so perhaps this new code should live here.

In https://github.com/dask/community/issues/346 I wrote up the difference between Dask Clusters and Dask Runners. The TL;DR is that a Cluster creates the scheduler and worker tasks directly, for example dask_jobqueue.SLURMCluster submits jobs to SLURM for each worker. A Dask Runner is different because it is invoked from within an existing allocation and populates that job with Dask processes. This the same as how Dask MPI works.

SlurmRunner Example

If I write a Python script and call it with srun -n 6 python myscript.py the script will be invoked by Slurm 6 times in parallel on 6 different nodes/cores on the HPC. The Dask Runner class then uses the Slurm process ID environment variable to decide what role reach process should play and uses the shared filesystem to bootstrap communications with a scheduler file.

# myscript.py
from dask.distributed import Client
from dask_hpc_runner import SlurmRunner

# When entering the SlurmRunner context manager processes will decide if they should be 
# the client, schdeduler or a worker.
# Only process ID 1 executes the contents of the context manager.
# All other processes start the Dask components and then block here forever.
with SlurmRunner(scheduler_file="/path/to/shared/filesystem/scheduler-{job_id}.json") as runner:

    # The runner object contains the scheduler address info and can be used to construct a client.
    with Client(runner) as client:

        # Wait for all the workers to be ready before continuing.
        client.wait_for_workers(runner.n_workers)

        # Then we can submit some work to the Dask scheduler.
        assert client.submit(lambda x: x + 1, 10).result() == 11
        assert client.submit(lambda x: x + 1, 20, workers=2).result() == 21

# When process ID 1 exits the SlurmRunner context manager it sends a graceful shutdown to the Dask processes.
Should this live in dask-jobqueue?

I'm at the point of trying to decide where this code should live within the Dask ecosystem. So far I have implemented MPIRunner and SlurmRunner as a proof-of-concept. It would be very straight forward to write runners for other batch systems provided it is possible to detect the process ID/rank from the environment.

I can imagine users choosing between SLURMCluster and SlurmRunner depending on their use case and how they want to deploy Dask. There are pros/cons to each deployment model, for example the cluster can adaptively scale, but the runner only requires a single job submission which will guarantee better node locality. So perhaps it makes sense for SlurmRunner to live here in dask-jobqueue and we can use documentation to help users choose the right one for them? (We can make the name casing more consistent).

The MPIRunner and SlurmRunner share a common base class, so I'm not sure if that means MPIRunner should also live here, or whether we should accept some code duplication and put it in dask-mpi?

Alternatively my prototype repo could just move to dask-contrib and become a separate project?

Or we could roll all of dask-jobqueue, dask-mpi and the new dask-hpc-runners into a single dask-hpc package? Or pull everything into dask-jobqueue?

The Dask HPC tooling is currently very fragmented and I'm keen to make things better, not worse. But I'm very keen to hear opinions from folks like @guillaumeeb @lesteve @jrbourbeau @kmpaul @mrocklin on what we should do here.

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
256
Forks
149
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de dask/dask-jobqueue

Todos los issues de dask/dask-jobqueue

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.