Adaptive scaling and dask-jobqueue goes into endless loop when a job launches several worker processes (was: Different configs result in worker death)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- distributed-systems, hpc
Línea de trabajo
Reproduce el comportamiento informado con SLURMCluster usando las configuraciones threaded, process-only y balanced, y luego compara cluster.adapt con cluster.scale. Comienza por los puntos de entrada del escalado adaptativo y del ciclo de vida de los workers; se considera terminado cuando el escalado adaptativo ya no entra en un bucle infinito ni pierde workers mientras progresa la carga de trabajo.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What happened:
(Reposting from SO)
I'm using Dask Jobequeue on a Slurm supercomputer (I'll note that this is also a Cray machine). My workload includes a mix of threaded (i.e. numpy) and python workloads, so I think a balance of threads and processes would be best for my deployment (which is the default behaviour). However, in order for my jobs to run I need to use this basic configuration:
cluster = SLURMCluster(cores=20,
processes=1,
memory="60GB",
walltime='12:00:00',
...
)
cluster.adapt(minimum=0, maximum=20)
client = Client(cluster)
which is entirely threaded. The tasks also seem to take longer than I would naively expect (a large part of this is a lot of file reading/writing). Switching to purely processes, i.e.
cluster = SLURMCluster(cores=20,
processes=20,
memory="60GB",
walltime='12:00:00',
...
)
results in slurm jobs which are immediately killed by Slurm as they are launched, with the only output like:
slurmstepd: error: *** JOB 11116133 ON nid00201 CANCELLED AT 2021-04-29T17:23:25 ***
Choosing a balanced configuration (i.e. default)
cluster = SLURMCluster(cores=20,
memory="60GB",
walltime='12:00:00',
...
)
results in a strange intermediate behaviour. The task will run near to completion (i.e. 900/1000 work tasks) then a number of the workers will be killed, and the progress will drop back down to, say, 400/1000 tasks.
Further, I've found that using cluster.scale, rather than cluster.adapt, results in a successful run of the work. Perhaps the issue here is how adapt is trying to scale the number of jobs?
What you expected to happen:
I would expect that changing the balance of processes / threads shouldn't change the lifetime of a worker.
Anything else we need to know?:
Possibly related to #20 and #363
As an aside, the current configuration of processes / threads confusing, and seems to conflict with how e.g. a LocalCluster is specified. Is there any progress on #231?
Environment:
- Dask version: 2021.4.1
- Python version: 3.8.8
- Operating System: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3
- Install method (conda, pip, source): conda
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 256
- Forks
- 149
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de dask/dask-jobqueue
-
bug LSF
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
dask/dask-jobqueue#703 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
dask/dask-jobqueue#701 ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
dask/dask-jobqueue#699 · 2 comentarios ·
-
bug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
dask/dask-jobqueue#692 · 1 comentario ·
-
bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
dask/dask-jobqueue#691 · 7 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de dask/dask-jobqueue
Issues similares
-
bug server
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
sportsdataverse/sportsdataverse-py#641 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18532 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día