Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Async: every connection opens its own topology monitor connection (pool of N holds 2N connections)

Abierto
#1,284 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

@AhmadMasry ya está trabajando en esto.

Desde el 6/10/2026.

  • #1285 de @AhmadMasry — cerrado sin fusionar
  • #1290 de @AhmadMasry — abierto

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
postgresql, python, sqlalchemy

Línea de trabajo

Start with aio/wrapper.py, aio/host_list_provider.py, and aio/host_monitoring_plugin.py to compare provider construction, monitor sharing, and resource release; inspect the linked pull requests first, since work is already underway. Reproduce the issue using the script in the report and check that connections to one cluster share a monitor and that it stops after the last connection releases it.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Describe the bug

With the async API (aws_advanced_python_wrapper.aio), every application connection that uses a topology-aware plugin (failover, failover_v2, read_write_splitting, custom_endpoint, ...) starts its own AsyncClusterTopologyMonitor, and each monitor opens its own dedicated monitoring connection. A pool of N connections to one cluster therefore holds 2N server connections.

The sync wrapper shares one topology monitor per cluster id, so the same pool holds N + 1 connections.

Cause:

  • aio/wrapper.py (AsyncAwsWrapperConnection.connect) builds a new host list provider via _build_host_list_provider(...) on every connect.
  • AsyncAuroraHostListProvider._get_or_create_monitor() (aio/host_list_provider.py) stores the monitor on the provider instance (self._monitor). It isn't shared across providers with the same cluster id.
  • Sync RdsHostListProvider._get_or_create_monitor() (host_list_provider.py) uses monitor_service.run_if_absent(ClusterTopologyMonitorImpl, self.get_cluster_id(), ...), so it is shared.

There's a second problem: closing the connection doesn't stop its monitor. AsyncPluginServiceImpl.release_resources() only releases the host list provider when it is an AsyncCanReleaseResources, and AsyncAuroraHostListProvider isn't one. The monitor is only stopped by release_resources_async() at shutdown. Under a pool that replaces connections (failover, pool_pre_ping invalidation, pool_recycle), monitoring connections build up over time.

Expected Behavior

As in the sync wrapper, connections to the same cluster share one topology monitor and one monitoring connection, and the monitor stops once no connection uses it.

What plugins are used? What other connection properties were set?

wrapper_dialect=aurora-pg&wrapper_plugins=failover,host_monitoring_v2 via create_async_engine("postgresql+aws_wrapper_psycopg://..."). Any topology-aware plugin triggers it. host_monitoring_v2 alone does not, because its monitors are already shared per host.

Current Behavior

A user reported that with an async SQLAlchemy engine and a pool of 10 connections, Aurora PostgreSQL showed 20 connections from the app. The sync wrapper showed 11 for the same setup.

The script below reproduces it without a database:

app connections:            10
distinct cluster ids:       1
running topology monitors:  10
monitor connections opened: 10
Reproduction Steps
import asyncio
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock

from aws_advanced_python_wrapper.aio import release_resources_async
from aws_advanced_python_wrapper.aio.host_list_provider import \
    AsyncAuroraHostListProvider
from aws_advanced_python_wrapper.utils.properties import Properties

POOL_SIZE = 10
monitor_conns_opened = 0


async def monitor_conn_factory():
    # Stands in for aio/wrapper.py's _monitor_conn_factory.
    global monitor_conns_opened
    monitor_conns_opened += 1
    return MagicMock()


async def main():
    props = Properties({"host": "db.cluster-xyz.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com",
                        "port": "5432", "plugins": "failover"})
    providers = []
    for i in range(POOL_SIZE):
        # aio/wrapper.py builds a new provider on every connect.
        driver_dialect = MagicMock()
        driver_dialect.is_closed = AsyncMock(return_value=False)
        p = AsyncAuroraHostListProvider(
            props, driver_dialect, monitor_connection_factory=monitor_conn_factory)
        try:
            await p.refresh(MagicMock())  # what connect does
        except Exception:
            pass  # the fake connection can't run the topology query
        providers.append(p)
    await asyncio.sleep(0.5)
    running = sum(1 for p in providers if p._monitor is not None and p._monitor.is_running())
    print(f"app connections:            {POOL_SIZE}")
    print(f"distinct cluster ids:       {len({p.get_cluster_id() for p in providers})}")
    print(f"running topology monitors:  {running}")
    print(f"monitor connections opened: {monitor_conns_opened}")
    await release_resources_async()

asyncio.run(main())
Possible Solution

Share AsyncClusterTopologyMonitor per cluster id in a module-level registry, the way aio/host_monitoring_plugin.py already shares EFM monitors per host. Add release_resources() to the async topology providers so closing a connection releases its reference, and stop the monitor when the last reference is released.

Additional Information/Context

Found while helping a user who moved from psycopg's AsyncConnectionPool to an async SQLAlchemy engine. I'm working on a fix and will open a PR that references this issue.

The AWS Advanced Python Wrapper version used

main at c2cd657 (async API, not yet released)

python version used

Python 3.14

Operating System and version

macOS (reproduced locally); the user's environment wasn't stated

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
99
Forks
22
Merge medio
1 d 7 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
4

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de aws/aws-advanced-python-wrapper

Todos los issues de aws/aws-advanced-python-wrapper

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.