Implement Spark-compatible `transform_values` (higher-order map function)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading datafusion/functions-nested/src/array_transform.rs as the model for evaluating a lambda over flattened entries, then look at crates/spark/src/function/lambda/mod.rs, which is still an empty ScalarUDF placeholder needing a HigherOrderUDF list and registration. Reuse the MapArray helpers in crates/spark/src/function/map/utils.rs to rebuild the output map with the original offsets, nulls and key array. Done means crates/sqllogictest/test_files/lambda/transform_values.slt passes against the examples and edge cases above, including arity mismatch errors and NULL/empty maps.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Part of #176 and apache/datafusion-comet#7300.
What the function does
transform_values(expr, func) returns a map with the same keys, in the same order, whose values are func(k, v)
for each entry of the map expr. The result type is MAP<keyType, func.dataType> with
valueContainsNull = func.nullable. A NULL map gives NULL, and the result is nullable if the input is. The lambda
takes exactly 2 parameters: k (non-null) and v (nullable when the input's valueContainsNull is true). expr
must be a MAP (DATATYPE_MISMATCH.UNEXPECTED_INPUT_TYPE otherwise). A non-lambda func is wrapped in a hidden
lambda. Available since Spark 3.0.0. No aliases.
Keys are not modified, so there is no dedup policy and no NULL_MAP_KEY check. Spark reuses the input key array
directly (new ArrayBasedMapData(map.keyArray(), resultValues)).
Examples
SELECT transform_values(map_from_arrays(array(1, 2, 3), array(1, 2, 3)), (k, v) -> v + 1);
-- {1:2,2:3,3:4}
SELECT transform_values(map_from_arrays(array(1, 2, 3), array(1, 2, 3)), (k, v) -> k + v);
-- {1:2,2:4,3:6}
-- nested view: (1, map(1,1,2,2,3,3)), (2, map(4,4,5,5,6,6)) as t(x, ys)
SELECT transform_values(ys, (k, v) -> k + v) FROM nested;
-- {1:2,2:4,3:6} / {4:8,5:10,6:12}
SELECT transform_values(map('a', 1, 'b', 2), 999);
-- {"a":999,"b":999}
SELECT transform_values(map('a', 1, 'b', 2), struct('val', 999));
-- {"a":{"col1":"val","col2":999},"b":{"col1":"val","col2":999}}
These come from the ExpressionDescription and higher-order-functions.sql.out. HigherOrderFunctionsSuite adds:
| map | lambda | result |
|---|---|---|
{1:1, 2:null, 3:3} |
v + 1 |
{1:2, 2:null, 3:4} |
{1:1, 2:null, 3:3} |
k * k |
{1:1, 2:4, 3:9} |
{"a":"xy", "bb":"yz", "ccc":"zx"} |
length(v) + 1 |
{"a":3, "bb":3, "ccc":3} |
{"a":"xy", "bb":null, "ccc":"zx"} |
concat(k, v) |
{"a":"axy", "bb":null, "ccc":"ccczx"} |
{} |
any | {} |
| NULL | any | NULL |
Edge cases to test
- A NULL map gives NULL. An empty map gives
{}, also when the value type changes (MAP<STRING, INT>from
length(v) + 1). - NULL values passed to the lambda:
v + 1gives NULL there, whilek * kignoresvand gives a value. The result
valueContainsNullfollows the lambda's nullability. - Value-type changes (string to int, int to struct, int to map). Chained calls:
transform_values(transform_values(m, (k, v) -> concat(k, v)), (k, v) -> concat(k, v))on
{"a":"xy","bb":null,"ccc":"zx"}gives{"a":"aaxy","bb":null,"ccc":"cccccczx"}. - Key order and key values are preserved exactly, including float keys such as
-0.0andNaN, which are not
re-normalized. Use the input key array as it is. - Lambda arity:
v -> v + 1and(k, v, x) -> ...must fail withINVALID_LAMBDA_FUNCTION_CALL.NUM_ARGS_MISMATCH.
DataFusion's planner allows a lambda to declare fewer parameters than offered, so this check has to be explicit. - Captured outer columns, nondeterministic value expressions (once per entry), and ANSI errors inside the lambda
(v / 0, overflow). - Sliced
MapArrayinput and values hidden under NULL map rows. The lambda must not be evaluated on them, because
they could raise errors Spark never raises.
Differences across Spark versions
- None found in
TransformValuesbetween 3.4 and 4.2. The literal-argument cases in the golden file were added in
4.1, which only adds tests. ANSI mode is on by default from 4.0.
Implementation notes
- Spark:
TransformValuesinsql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala. - Infrastructure. DataFusion's higher-order function framework (
HigherOrderUDFImplin
datafusion/expr/src/higher_order_function.rs, andLambdaArgument::evaluatewithspread_capturesfor captured
columns) is onbranch-56, which this crate uses.lambda_parametersshould offer[key (non-null), value]. - DataFusion core has no higher-order map functions. This is the simplest of the map functions to build:
- Evaluate the lambda once over the flattened entry keys and values, spreading captures with the per-entry row
index, asarray_transformdoes indatafusion/functions-nested/src/array_transform.rs. - Rebuild the
MapArraywith the original offsets, nulls and keys, and the new values.
- Evaluate the lambda once over the flattened entry keys and values, spreading captures with the per-entry row
- This crate's
crates/spark/src/function/lambda/mod.rsis an emptyScalarUDFplaceholder. It needs a
HigherOrderUDFlist and registration throughregister_higher_order_function/
SessionStateBuilder::higher_order_functions.crates/spark/src/function/map/utils.rshasMapArrayhelpers. - Add
crates/sqllogictest/test_files/lambda/transform_values.sltand document the function with#[user_doc].
This issue was generated by an LLM (Claude) from the Apache Spark source code and tests. Examples come from Spark's ExpressionDescription examples, test suites and .sql.out golden files, but please verify them against Spark before relying on them.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 7
- Forks
- 15
- Merge medio
- 16 h 43 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 26
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de apache/datafusion-spark
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
apache/datafusion-spark#287 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
apache/datafusion-spark#266 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug] make_dt_interval returns NULL for more than about 1.49 million days, Spark returns the intervalPosiblemente ocupada @Subodh-17 la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
apache/datafusion-spark#109 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 18/100
apache/datafusion-spark#299 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
apache/datafusion-spark#298 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de apache/datafusion-spark
Issues similares
-
comp-rbac
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#131875 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug(python): read_transaction raises TypeError on a Rewrite with rewritten indicesPosiblemente ocupada @Borg93 la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
lance-format/lance#11117 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
storytold/photocraft#15232 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
forge: fork preflight reads still send `requireCanonical: false`, which Rootstock rejects (-32603)Posiblemente ocupada @Ynyesto la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
foundry-rs/foundry#18485 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
bondybondbond/rushcut#238 · 1 comentario ·