Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

[Proposal] TCOD — extending slime's On-Policy Distillation to multi-turn agents

Abierto
#2,002 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Stack tecnológico
python

Línea de trabajo

Comienza con CONTRIBUTING.md y el punto de entrada existente examples/on_policy_distillation; después, determina si slime admite la ruta de rollout multi-turno descrita en el issue. Se considera completado cuando se haya establecido si TCOD debe incorporarse como un ejemplo hermano verificable o debe seguir siendo un proyecto independiente enlazado desde README.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

question
Your Question

I'd like to bring TCOD (a published method, arXiv:2604.24005) to slime: on-policy distillation for multi-turn agents with a temporal curriculum — essentially the multi-turn extension of your existing single-turn OPD example (examples/on_policy_distillation). It is not yet implemented in any RL framework, so I'm asking where it best fits before writing any slime-specific code, rather than showing up with an unsolicited recipe PR. Two concrete questions:

  1. Does slime support multi-turn agent rollouts (LLM → env step → repeat) that TCOD's curriculum would hook into? Your current OPD example is single-turn (math), so if multi-turn agent rollout isn't a supported path yet, TCOD probably belongs in a standalone repo instead of the core examples.
  2. If multi-turn rollout is supported, would you accept TCOD as an example sibling to examples/on_policy_distillation (lightweight, CI/run-verifiable)? If not, would you be open to linking a standalone TCOD repo from the slime README — the path CONTRIBUTING points to for algorithm-style projects?

Either way I'm not proposing large refactors or new abstractions into the core.

What I've Tried
  • Read CONTRIBUTING and checked TCOD against your scope, which is why I'm opening a question first instead of a PR.
  • Studied examples/on_policy_distillation: a Qwen3-8B student imitates a Qwen3-32B teacher by matching token-level log-probs as a KL penalty on top of the advantage estimator (Math500 76% → 94%), single-turn, with sglang / megatron teacher modes. TCOD reuses this same on-policy KL-to-teacher objective.
  • TCOD itself (in the paper): single-turn OPD applied to multi-turn agents is unstable — errors compound across turns, per-turn KL grows with turn index, trajectory KL escalates and success rate collapses. TCOD keeps the standard KL-to-teacher objective but grows the trajectory depth k exposed to the student short→long (k = min(k_start + floor(n/η), k_max)), in two variants: F2B (student rolls out only the first k steps, drop-in) and B2F (teacher replays the first L-k steps to seed the student, then student takes the remaining k). Reported gains: +up to ~15 SR over vanilla OPD, stable KL, ~32% less training time.
Environment (if relevant)

No response

Additional Context
Pre-submission Checklist
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
8.7k
Forks
1.3k
Merge medio
12 h 30 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
32

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de THUDM/slime

Todos los issues de THUDM/slime

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.