Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Keep a mid-session task statement in judge evidence (needs a brainstorm; verb anchors failed in #101)

Cerrado
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#106 3 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript
Área
ai, backend-api-design

Línea de trabajo

Examine the judge evidence window logic in the codebase, likely in a file handling session state or evidence tracking. Look for where messages are pinned or aged out. Review the history from issue #101 to understand the previous verb anchor attempts. The goal is to design a mechanism to identify and preserve task statements that occur mid-session without crowding other evidence.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

enhancement ready-for-agent

A task stated mid-session ages out of the judge's evidence window when it has no scope word. The plan's step 6 asked for task verbs in the anchor pattern to keep it. That was tried in #101 and dropped. Saved for a brainstorm round.

"hello" -> "add the provider neuralwatt" -> "ok" -> "yes" -> "try it"    (tail 3)
jev-v3 evidence: hello (pinned), ok, yes, try it      <- the task statement is gone

The first message since /clear is pinned, so a session that opens with its task keeps it. This issue is the case where the task comes later.

Why a verb list didn't work

Four Codex rounds on #101, each fix trading one miss for another:

Round Finding Cause
1 close missing; past recounts kept finite list, lexical proxy
2 closing couldn't be formed suffix rules
3 5 recounts crowd the request out of the capped slots; cleanup dropped round 1's tense-blindness; round 2's rewrite
4 first-anchored pin drops an unlisted first request round 3's pin change

Any lexical anchor has both failure directions: an unlisted verb loses a request, and a listed one kept in a recount crowds real requests out of the 8 slots.

Directions for the brainstorm

  • Ask Jev which earlier messages state the current task (a selection question over candidate messages) instead of matching words.
  • Give task-bearing messages their own reserved slots, separate from the recency tail, so nothing crowds them out.
  • Measure first: how many authorizing messages in the mined week sat mid-session versus first. The plan counts 15 aged out, but not where they sat.
Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
0
Forks
1
Merge medio
2 h 10 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
64

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de STRML/omp-classifier

Todos los issues de STRML/omp-classifier

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.