[Feature]: PAIR feedback: model-level routing toggles, controlled test runs, and concurrency controls
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 12/100
Línea de trabajo
This is a broad feature request covering several separate controls: per-model routing toggles, keep-loaded, concurrency limits, and test-runner scope. No files, tests or entry points are named in the payload, so start by locating the model load/eject actions and the test runner in the desktop UI. Done would mean the request is split into smaller issues with agreed scope.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Area
Desktop experience
User problem
Hi NVIDIA PAIR team,
First, thank you for building and releasing Personal AI Router. I’m genuinely excited about the product. I love NVIDIA’s local AI direction, and PAIR is exactly the kind of tool I want to use across my RTX machines.
After setting up PAIR across two Windows systems, I ran into a few workflow issues that I think could be improved with some model-level controls.
Right now, PAIR appears to expose model actions like load and eject, but I could not find a clean way to decide which installed models are eligible for routing. That makes the routing behavior feel too automatic. I would love to see controls such as:
- Enable/disable routing per model
- Keep-loaded toggle per model
- Max concurrent models per node
- Preferred node per model
- “Test selected model only”
- “Test selected node only”
- A safer “test all” mode that runs one model at a time, or with a visible concurrency limit
- Time Based Scheduled Loading of Model or Models and Model Grouping
In my setup, the broad test behavior appeared to launch many workload checks across many models at once. Some tests passed, but many failed with messages like “client disconnected before completion” or “context canceled.” When I tested specific models one at a time, the routes worked much more reliably. So the issue seemed less like every model was broken and more like the test runner was overloading the environment or timing out before queued model loads could complete.
I think PAIR would be much easier to trust if installed models, loaded models, and routing-eligible models were treated as separate states in the UI.
Thank you again for the work on PAIR. I’m excited about where this is going, and I hope this feedback is useful.
Best,
Chris
Desired outcome
- Enable/disable routing per model
- Keep-loaded toggle per model
- Max concurrent models per node
- Preferred node per model
- “Test selected model only”
- “Test selected node only”
- A safer “test all” mode that runs one model at a time, or with a visible concurrency limit
- Time Based Scheduled Loading of Model or Models and Model Grouping
Alternatives considered
No response
Compatibility and security implications
No response
Validation approach
No response
Confirmations
- I searched existing issues for duplicates.
- I agree to follow the Code of Conduct.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 277
- Merge medio
- 4 d 14 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 31
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router
-
Dificultad 4/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 18/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#175 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#165 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 46/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#164 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
enhancement
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#154 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
[Feature]: [Ollama] Alert the user about model pull failuresPosiblemente ocupada @ckelseynv la tomó hace 7 días. Abiertoenhancement
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 56/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#152 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Todos los issues de NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
keyxmakerx/Chronicle#1469 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai#5565 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug frontend grammar sev-3
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 63/100
-
connector docs good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
soma-intelligence/open-health-sync#134 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug frontend
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días