IGC heap corruption compiling findmax's reduction kernel on Julia 1.12 with --check-bounds=yes
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Área
- compilers
Línea de trabajo
The crash is inside libigc.so, not in this repo, so start by reproducing it: compile the attached repro.spvasm with ocloc compile -spirv_input for tgllp, or run findmax(abs, x) on Julia 1.12 with --check-bounds=yes. The issue points to upstream commit 522dc7026a6d0b13da721d3364c053b4ee1673b7, which adds insertvalue handling for non-extract users of *.with.overflow intrinsics. Done means the PHI repro compiles and the GPUArrays indexing find test passes on 1.12.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
On Julia 1.12, the GPUArrays testsuite's gpuarrays/indexing find test kills its worker while compiling a kernel:
free(): invalid next size (fast)
[108861] signal 6 (-6): Aborted
__libc_free at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
unknown function at .../libigc.so
...
IGC::IgcOclTranslationCtx<0ul>::Impl::Translate(...) at .../libigc.so
L0::ModuleTranslationUnit::compileGenBinary(...) at .../libze_intel_gpu.so.1
L0::zeModuleCreate(...)
link_kernel at src/compiler/compilation.jl:366
...
mapreduce_1d_gpu at AcceleratedKernels/src/reduce/mapreduce_1d_gpu.jl:109
...
findmax at GPUArrays/src/host/indexing.jl:309
GPUArrays/test/testsuite/indexing.jl:234
Sometimes it's a segfault in libigc.so instead of the abort; it's heap corruption. This has failed the Julia 1.12 job on main since #665 (GPUArrays 12, which routes findmax through AcceleratedKernels' _mapreduce_block!): 1785, 1799, 1800. The 1.10, 1.11, 1.13 and nightly jobs pass, and pull requests don't run 1.12, so it didn't show up before the merge. It also reproduces locally on main (fa0f23a2) on an Iris Xe (TGL), with NEO 26.18.38308 and libigc 2.34.4+3.
Reproducer
It needs Julia 1.12 and --check-bounds=yes, as the test runner uses:
# julia +1.12 --check-bounds=yes
using oneAPI
x = oneArray(randn(Float32, 100))
findmax(abs, x)
Without --check-bounds=yes it works. The element types the test runner adds don't matter: the failing test uses Float32.
Cause
This is an IGC bug that is already fixed upstream. The first pass of _mapreduce_block! gets a loop whose induction variable increments are turned into llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i64 (OpIAddCarry in the SPIR-V), and IGC's optimizer then folds the extractvalues of two of those calls into a PHI of the whole {i64, i1} struct. IGC's LegalizationPass lowers *.with.overflow intrinsics by replacing their extractvalue users and erasing the call. It only expects extractvalue users (a debug build asserts "Did not expect anything but an extract after uadd_with_overflow"; release builds skip the assertion), so the PHI is left using a deleted instruction. The IGC IR dump after LegalizationPass (IGC_ShaderDumpEnableAll=1) shows phi { i64, i1 } [ <badref>, ... ], and the compiler crashes in a later pass or in free.
The SPIR-V is valid (spirv-val passes). It reproduces offline with ocloc, so the GPU and the driver aren't involved. A reduced kernel:
repro.spvasm
OpCapability Kernel
OpCapability Addresses
OpCapability Int64
%1 = OpExtInstImport "OpenCL.std"
OpMemoryModel Physical64 OpenCL
OpEntryPoint Kernel %kernel "kernel"
OpExecutionMode %kernel ContractionOff
OpSource OpenCL_CPP 100000
%ulong = OpTypeInt 64 0
%bool = OpTypeBool
%void = OpTypeVoid
%15 = OpTypeFunction %void %ulong %bool
%_struct_16 = OpTypeStruct %ulong %ulong
%17 = OpConstantNull %ulong
%ulong_18446744073709551615 = OpConstant %ulong 18446744073709551615
%ulong_1 = OpConstant %ulong 1
%kernel = OpFunction %void None %15
%n = OpFunctionParameter %ulong
%c = OpFunctionParameter %bool
%entry = OpLabel
OpSwitch %n %outer_preheader 0 %exit 1 %exit
%outer_preheader = OpLabel
%23 = OpIAdd %ulong %n %ulong_18446744073709551615
OpBranch %outer
%outer = OpLabel
OpBranchConditional %c %inner_preheader %exit_loopexit1
%inner_preheader = OpLabel
OpBranch %inner
%inner = OpLabel
%24 = OpPhi %ulong %23 %inner_preheader %25 %inner_cont
%26 = OpIAddCarry %_struct_16 %24 %ulong_1
%25 = OpCompositeExtract %ulong %26 0
%27 = OpCompositeExtract %ulong %26 1
%28 = OpINotEqual %bool %27 %17
OpBranchConditional %28 %latch %inner_cont
%inner_cont = OpLabel
OpBranchConditional %c %inner %exit_loopexit
%exit_loopexit = OpLabel
OpBranch %exit
%exit_loopexit1 = OpLabel
OpBranch %exit
%exit = OpLabel
OpReturn
%latch = OpLabel
OpBranch %outer
OpFunctionEnd
$ spirv-as --target-env spv1.4 repro.spvasm -o repro.spv
$ ocloc compile -spirv_input -file repro.spv -device tgllp
Segmentation fault
It crashes with libigc 2.34.4+1, +2 and +3 (so it isn't related to our backports) and with libigc 2.22.2.
Fix
intel/intel-graphics-compiler@522dc7026a6d0b13da721d3364c053b4ee1673b7 ("Add support for non-extract users of llvm.*.with.overflow intrinsics", first in v2.42.0) rebuilds the struct with insertvalue for any user that isn't an extractvalue. Its test covers freeze users, but the change handles PHI users the same way. The patch applies cleanly to v2.34.4, so it could be backported to libigc_jll like #670 and #678, ideally with a LIT test for the PHI case.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Julia
- Estrellas
- 217
- Forks
- 37
- Merge medio
- 1 d 7 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 45
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de JuliaGPU/oneAPI.jl
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
libraries upstream
Dificultad 4/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 22/100
JuliaGPU/oneAPI.jl#703 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
JuliaGPU/oneAPI.jl#663 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de JuliaGPU/oneAPI.jl
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
JuliaGenAI/HuggingFaceDatasets.jl#96 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
JuliaData/DBFTables.jl#50 ·
-
_fit_phylo_binomial_xlv: default start calls undefined logit (UndefVarError without beta_init)Posiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertocode-review
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
JuliaNLSolvers/Optim.jl#1296 ·