Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

feat: cache Graphify context outside the repository

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#4,063 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

@hiyouwhatsapp ya está trabajando en esto.

Desde el 18/10/2026.

  • #1 de @hiyouwhatsapp — abierto
  • #4590 de @hiyouwhatsapp — abierto

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
git, python
Área
developer-experience, devtools

Línea de trabajo

Start by reading the existing --update workflow and locating how graphify-out/ is created, discovered, and reused. Define how a repository is identified in ~/.graphify/projects/<repository>/, how branch or path changes are detected, and how the existing graph is safely reused after a reset; done means the behavior is specified and tested for repository syncs and missing local output.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

I work on multiple projects where main changes frequently.

My usual workflow looks like this:

  1. Generate a Graphify map of the repository.
  2. Use graph.json, GRAPH_REPORT.md, and the visualization as context for my coding agent.
  3. Before starting another contribution, sync my local branch with the latest upstream main.
  4. Continue working from the updated codebase.

The problem is that Graphify's generated files are local-only and usually ignored by Git. In some Git workflows, such as resetting or cleaning the local repository while syncing with upstream, this local Graphify context can be removed.

I then have to generate the graph again.

Graphify already supports --update, which is useful when the existing graph is still available. The problem is when the local graph itself is lost during repository maintenance.

Would it make sense for Graphify to support storing its local graph outside the repository?

For example:

~/.graphify/projects/<repository>/

The repository could then reference that local graph instead of depending entirely on graphify-out/ inside the working tree.

This could allow a workflow like:

clone/sync repository
        ↓
Graphify finds the existing local graph
        ↓
detect changed files
        ↓
update only what changed

Instead of:

clone/sync repository
        ↓
local Graphify output is gone
        ↓
build the project graph again

The exact implementation could be different. The main idea is simply to make Graphify's local knowledge persistent across branch resets, upstream syncs, or other Git operations that replace or clean the working tree.

This would be especially useful for contributors working on fast-moving repositories, where pulling or resetting to the latest upstream branch happens frequently.

Is there already a recommended workflow for this, or would persistent repository-level local storage be useful?

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
124k
Forks
11.9k
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de Graphify-Labs/graphify

Todos los issues de Graphify-Labs/graphify

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.