Job logs grow without bound: recursive search of runtime logs consumed 152 GiB and filled disk
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 38/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Área
- cli, observability
Línea de trabajo
Start with internal/session/jobs.go, especially jobSink.Write and the newJob/claimJobLog path that creates job spools. Trace how stdout and stderr are written, then inspect existing job-related tests before defining coverage for bounded disk usage, truncation or rotation, error reporting, and recursive-search output. Done means sustained output and recursive searches remain bounded while child processes continue draining safely.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
A recursive search launched by CodeAF consumed approximately 152.6 GiB across four job logs and kept growing until the laptop ran out of space. The search included CodeAF's own runtime log directory, so its output contained deeply nested copies of earlier search output. The disk spool has no size bound even though the in-memory output does.
Observed incident
- macOS arm64; CodeAF session workspace was
$HOME. - Logs under
$HOME/.codeaf/v3/projects/<project>/<session>/logs/jobs/:129.log: 64.49 GiB allocated, discovered during follow-up cleanup150.log: 46.07 GiB152.log: 27.67 GiB154.log: 13.62 GiB
- The initial size snapshot of
150.log,152.log, and154.logtotaled 87.36 GiB. By cleanup, those three had 88.11 GiB allocated; adding129.logbrings the four-log cleanup total to approximately 152.60 GiB. These are different observation times, not inconsistent totals. - Over a three-second observation,
150.log,152.log, and154.loggrew by approximately 3.0, 2.7, and 2.9 MiB respectively. - The laptop reached approximately 117 MiB free, and newly reclaimed cache/download space was being consumed again. An unrelated operation failed with
ENOSPC. - Three live recursive
grepprocesses were identified and terminated before log cleanup. No CodeAF daemon shutdown was needed to stop those processes. - A bounded 16 KiB tail sample from
154.logcontained 159 occurrences of/logs/jobs/; the nested matches repeatedly referenced129.logwith line-number prefixes. A separate 64 KiB tail preserved from129.logshows the same search phrase matched across CodeAF worktrees, stored task transcripts, runtime stubs, and fix records; that sample does not contain nested job-log prefixes or establish the original command that started it. Raw logs are omitted because they include local paths and unrelated user content.
One observed command, with the home path redacted:
grep -rn "git push is not yours to run" "$HOME/.codeaf" /usr/local /opt/homebrew 2> /dev/null
The nested output had this structure (schematic, path/session values removed):
$HOME/.codeaf/.../logs/jobs/129.log:<line>:$HOME/.codeaf/.../logs/jobs/129.log:<earlier-line>:...
This directly establishes that searches were re-ingesting CodeAF job output. A live search reading its own spool is a plausible feedback mechanism, but the preserved tail alone does not establish which process first entered that loop. Later searches also replayed already-amplified output.
Relevant implementation
Inspected source revision: 2d60ab4b3c4ecb70d51a1918d4384db24fd1fb0c (the installed development binary does not embed a usable revision, so this is not asserted to be its exact build).
internal/session/jobs.go,jobSink.Write: every chunk is written to the file without a byte budget or rotation; only the in-memory ring is bounded.- The same writer ignores file-write errors and always returns success, explicitly including a full disk. That protects the child process but gives no disk-spool failure signal through this writer.
newJob/claimJobLogcreates the spool that receives both stdout and stderr.
Expected behavior / proposed fix
- Bound disk output per job and across retained job logs. Preserve a useful tail and a clear truncation/rotation notice when a limit is reached, while continuing to drain child output safely.
- Surface logging failures such as disk exhaustion instead of silently treating the spool as complete.
- Prevent generated recursive searches from including CodeAF runtime/spool directories by default, especially when the workspace is
$HOME; intentional log inspection should be explicit and bounded. - Add a regression covering a command whose output matches a recursive search of its spool tree, plus a sustained-output case. Verify both disk usage and process cleanup stay bounded.
No large reproduction or test suite was run on the affected laptop. This report is based on the live process/file observations, a bounded log sample, and source inspection. Full acceptance tests for any fix must run on Spark per the owner's standing policy.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9 h 44 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 766
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:headless bug sev:critical
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:tests bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1470 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-compile-instrumentation#1417 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
agent-research-finding agent-research-recommend chore ready-for-agent
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
jordansmall/spindrift#4068 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Type/Task
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
OpenNSW/nsw-srilanka#537 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
security
Dificultad 2/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día