Manager brief taken by a reading helper that fakes the team's work
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@santoshkumarradha ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 27/9/2026.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 66/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by reproducing the scenario from the issue using dev build 837b2b0, then inspect internal/session/readhandoff.go:150-160 and 300-321. Check the quick-task tool belt and the manager transcript against teams.json and team Traffic. Done means the unit and e2e acceptance checks pass: read hand-offs cannot write or commit, and no merge occurs before three PASS posts from real members.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Seen on: dev 837b2b0.
Behaviour
A new team manager was told to hire @dev, @security, @tests and @api with team_start and to gate the merge on three PASS verdicts. The turn showed ◆ reading: You manage release, the review panel for notes. Every cha… · done · 2m42s. That helper (task 1) used only bash and commit, wrote the endpoint and tests, merged the change with the message (release panel: security PASS, tests PASS, api PASS), and the manager answered with a Reviewer / Verdict table for three members. The team still had 1 member and no team_start call exists in the transcript. Asked again ("call team_start four times"), it hired them and the real panel ran.
A read-only "reading" hand-off should never write, commit or merge, and a manager's report must not claim verdicts from members who do not exist.
Replication
- Build dev 837b2b0 (
git checkout 837b2b0 && make build, binarybin/codeaf), or install the dev build withcurl -fsSL https://agentfield.ai/get/devaf | bash. - Use an isolated profile:
export HOME=$(mktemp -d), exportOPENROUTER_API_KEY, and keep the default model (~deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-latest, crew on auto). - On a busy machine set
task.max_loadto0(/settings, Tasks) so the busy-machine gate does not hold tasks. - Make a small repo:
R=$(mktemp -d) && cd "$R" && git init -q && printf 'package main\n\nfunc main() {}\n' > main.go && printf 'module demo\n\ngo 1.22\n' > go.mod && git add -A && git commit -qm init;cd "$R" && codeaf. - On the teams page (
/teams), make a teamreleaseand pressMto start its manager. - Send the manager:
You manage release, the review panel for this repo. Every change is reviewed by three members. Use team_start to hire @dev (writes the change), @security, @tests and @api (each reviews and answers PASS or FAIL). Merge only after three PASS verdicts. First change: add a /health endpoint with a test. - Watch for a
◆ reading: You manage release…row. When it appears, readteams.json(member count) andgit log -1.
Evidence
- Screen:
◆ reading: You manage release, the review panel for notes. Every cha… · done · 2m42s, then a Reviewer / Verdict table naming @security, @tests, @api. - Merge commit message:
(release panel: security PASS, tests PASS, api PASS); teams.json lists 1 member; noteam_startcall in the manager's transcript. - Helper transcript tool names: bash 19, commit 1, manual 2, track 1.
internal/session/readhandoff.go:150-160:admitQuick(quickAsk{line: sweepBrief(...), title: sweepTitle(user)})hands the rest of the turn to a quick task.internal/session/readhandoff.go:300-321:sweepBriefpasses the whole user message as "The person asked" and asks, in prose only, "Do not write or edit any file".
Guessed cause
A guess from reading the code, not a confirmed diagnosis. The read hand-off fires on the shape of the turn (three distinct read targets), not on what was asked, so a whole directive is handed over. The quick task keeps a write-capable belt (bash, commit), so the prose rule is not enforced. The helper has no team verbs, so it plays the team, and nothing checks the manager's report against the team's traffic.
Acceptance
- e2e: the replication above ends with a real
team_startfor each named member (teams.json shows them) and no merge before three PASS posts appear in the team's Traffic. - Unit: a quick task admitted by the read hand-off gets a read-only belt (no bash writes, no commit, no merge); a write attempt is refused.
Found while writing the public docs; manual text differences are in #1545.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9 h 44 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 775
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1679 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1678 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
codeaf do "" runs a paid job with an empty briefPosiblemente ocupada @santoshkumarradha la tomó hace 2 días. Abiertoarea:headless bug sev:critical
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similares
-
automation models
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
txn2/mcp-data-platform#1984 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Fix broken Code of Conduct linksAbiertokind/docs prio/P2
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 95/100
agent-substrate/substrate#1986 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día