Skill-suitability block leaks into the visible transcript — keep it model-context only
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 68/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- go
- Área
- cli, developer-experience, documentation
Línea de trabajo
Start with attachTurnSkillsLocked in internal/session/skillturn.go and the message rendering path in internal/session/chatlog.go; run the relevant skillturn tests first. Check the existing user.said assertion and turnSkillsNotice behavior, then update the manual page under internal/manual/chat/. Done means the model still receives the suitability block while every displayed transcript shows only the person's words and the specified e2e, unit, and documentation checks pass.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What happened
Every time a turn's words match skills on the active shelf, the person's own message in the visible transcript grows a block they never asked for:
Skills suited to this message:
- Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex. [/Users/santoshkumar/.codex/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md — body in this file]
- Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own. [/Users/santoshkumar/.agents/skills/prototype/SKILL.md — body in this file]
- Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff. [/Users/santoshkumar/.agents/skills/improve-animations/SKILL.md — body in this file]
Earlier-listed skills win when two skills conflict.
Observed 2026-09-25 on dev@7f136b3 in an ordinary chat turn (no flags). The skill-suitability list exists to inform the model which skills fit the message's words; it is not something the person said or asked to see, yet it is spliced into the user-role message, so every surface that draws the conversation prints it.
Replication
Deterministic (no model).
The splice is pure and needs no model. attachTurnSkillsLocked appends "\n\nSkills suited to this message:\n" + block to user.message whenever turnSkills returns a non-empty block (internal/session/skillturn.go, search Skills suited to this message). With an active shelf holding one skill whose doc shares words with a message, the message content messageContentText(user.message) equals the person's words plus the block; the display path renders that same text (internal/session/chatlog.go builds chat lines from messageContentText). A developer today can run a conversation with a one-skill shelf, send a message using that skill's words, and quote the block appearing in the printed transcript — that wrong output is the evidence.
Field (real models).
Any chat turn with an active skill shelf and a message matching a skill doc; reproduces on the first matching turn. No keys beyond a normal chat's; a couple of minutes of wall time.
Where
internal/session/skillturn.go—attachTurnSkillsLocked(searchable string:Skills suited to this message; the splice isuser.message = textMessage("user", messageContentText(user.message)+block)). The block rides inside the user-role message content, so anything that renders the conversation renders it.internal/session/chatlog.go— user messages are rendered frommessageContentText(...); the defect is not the skill choice but that the block lives in message text instead of a part the display path strips.- The person's true words are already kept separately (
user.said, asserted inskillturn_test.go), andturnSkillsNoticealready emits a dimskills carried: …event that surfaces may draw or ignore — so today two channels carry the same fact, one loud and visible.
The fix
The person's message in the transcript shows exactly the words they typed. Skill suitability is model context only: the block still reaches the model, but no surface prints it. Deliver it to the model in a form the display path does not render (a separate content part, or a tool-shaped entry), and use exactly one surface-visible channel — the existing dim "skills carried" notice — so the loud block and the notice never both appear.
Acceptance
- e2e: through the real chat door with an active shelf and a matching message — the transcript the person sees renders their message as their words only: the string
Skills suited to this message:appears nowhere the surface prints, while the model's copy of the message still carries the block (the existingskillturn_test.goassertion on the model's copy stays green), exit 0. - e2e: the control run —
codeaf do --json(or the non-TUI surface) for the same turn emits no text containingSkills suited to this message:, exit 0. - Unit: the display path — rendering the stored user message for a turn that carried skills never includes the block; the journal/store still hold the person's words unchanged (
user.said, already covered byskillturn_test.go). - The manual page that covers what appears in the transcript (
internal/manual/chat/) quotes the new wording — the transcript shows only what the person typed — and the change entry'sinvalidatesnames what people believed before.
Drafted with CodeAF · reviewed and owned by the author
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9 h 35 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 752
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:headless bug sev:critical
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
tui3: slash command completion inserts bare command prefix into prompt instead of navigatingAbiertoarea:chat bug sev:critical
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1548 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:tests bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similares
-
bug needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
netdata/netdata#24062 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
meshery/meshery#22119 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
automation documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[BUG] 安装向导生成了两个 rate_limit 无效参数Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día