task countdown hint promises 0 waits, and in a headless run 0 starts immediately
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 88/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- go
- Área
- cli, developer-experience
Línea de trabajo
Empieza en internal/config/settings.go:2298 y revisa internal/session/session.go:1806 para distinguir entre watched/headless. Añade una prueba para la sugerencia de cuenta atrás de la tarea, sin modificar internal/manual/chat/tasks.md. Se considera terminado cuando la sugerencia incluye la condición watched, coincide con tasks.md:1492 y la nueva prueba pasa.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
The defect is one string
The task countdown row's hint promises, unconditionally, that zero waits:
internal/config/settings.go:2298
"how many seconds a proposed task waits for you before it starts on its own. The countdown is your window to redirect it or wave it off, not a gate, 0 waits for your answer instead of starting. A change lands on the next session."
That promise holds only on a watched session. internal/session/session.go:1806 states the other half:
0 IS A CLOCK THAT IS OFF, the proposal waits for
Agent.ResolveTaskand nothing else, which is only a sentence a WATCHED session can honour: with nobody subscribed to the events (AskConsentfalse, or no turn hub), the deadline approves whatever this says, because a headless run has no one to wait for.
So on a headless run, zero does not wait for an answer. It approves immediately. The value a person types to make every proposal stop is the value that makes every proposal start.
Why this is the worst place for it
The surface closest to the decision is the one that is wrong. The hint is read at the moment the number is typed. The page a person would have to go looking for is already correct.
The manual is correct and MUST NOT be changed to match
internal/manual/chat/tasks.md scopes the promise properly in both places that tell a person to use zero:
:1492"Usetask.autoapprove_secondsin the Safety settings to give yourself a longer window, or set it to 0 so every watched proposal waits for you.":1510"Settask.autoapprove_secondsto 0 in Safety settings if every proposal on a watched session should wait until you answer."
Reconciling the two surfaces in the wrong direction would delete the only correct statement of the behaviour that exists. If the hint and the page disagree, the page wins.
Not live today, and the reason it is worth fixing anyway
DefaultTaskAutoApprove is 15 (settings.go:1429) and a persisted value is only taken when one is present (settings.go:4256), so nothing reaches zero by default. The hazard arrives the first time somebody types 0 meaning what the row told them it means.
Acceptance
- The hint carries the watched condition, in the shape
tasks.md:1492already uses. - A test holds it. A promise in a help string has nothing mechanical behind it today, which is why the two surfaces were free to drift apart: nothing relates the string to the behaviour it describes.
Read at d91bb63ae.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9 h 38 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 749
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1470 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1469 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1468 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similares
-
enhancement low priority
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
eugenioenko/ttt#674 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Remove obsolete ipAllocationPolicy field from containernodepool-subnetworkref test dependencyAbierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-config-connector#13462 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
vavallee/bindery#2793 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día