Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

ReaderThreadError: wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1)

Offen
#1,123 2 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
35/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Tech-Stack
ruby
Bereich
devtools

Rechercherichtung

Start with the stack trace at debug/server_dap.rb:504 and follow the greeting and connection flow through debug/server.rb:156 and debug/server.rb:54-56. Reproduce with Ruby 3.3.6, debug 1.9.2, and the nested-breakpoint scenario if possible, then verify that continuing or disconnecting no longer leaves the debugger or Rails request hung and does not emit the ReaderThreadError.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Your environment

  • ruby -v: 3.3.6
  • rdbg -v: 1.9.2
  • Inside docker (docker image ruby:3.3.6-slim-bookworm@sha256:7a89be75c6768a888f70c90f4626366de90909c4e4d62729775ea3b64672547c to be exact)
  • Process started like: bundle exec rdbg -O -n --session-name='web' -c -- bin/rails server -b 0.0.0.0 -p 3000
    • RUBY_DEBUG_SOCK_DIR=/app/tmp (Rails root being /app inside container, /app/tmp is a volume mounted into container so socket can be attached to from outside container)

Describe the bug

Quite often during the course of debugging the debugger process seems to becomes in a paused state but unable to display the current thread or breakpoint. Rails requests hang even if disconnecting from the remote debugger (VSCode connecting via a socket).

After that point the main process becomes unresponsive and the only way to continue is to restart the parent process (which in our case means restarting the docker container).

To Reproduce

We have seen this arise sporadically. The following is one way we've been able to reproduce it but we have seen it occur even when avoiding the below:

  • When paused at a breakpoint, calling another method manually (or in a watch) which has its own breakpoints set will cause execution to run to and pause at the nested breakpoint, but continuing from there will break the debugger.

    class Foo
      def a
        puts "hello"    # BP 1 <= active
        1 + 1
      end
    
      def b
        42              # BP 2
      end
    end
    Foo.new.a
    

    Given the following file with breakpoints set above, when stopped at BP 1, calling b will re-break at BP 2, but continuing from there seems to break the debugger and leave some thread in a hung state.

Again, this is just one cause but we have been able to reproduce it at times without any manual execution of methods with BPs. However, we do not have a reproduction case for this.

Expected behavior

The debugger doesn't hang

Additional context

When this is encountered, I disconnected VSCode's debugger and manually attached to the same debugger instance via rdbg -A socket. When doing so the debugger output shows:

root@b032c5a1c83b:/app> rdbg -A tmp/rdbg-7-web
(unknown) "Content-Length: 154\r\n"
(unknown) "\r\n"
(unknown) "{\"type\":\"event\",\"event\":\"output\",\"body\":{\"category\":\"console\",\"output\":\"DEBUGGER (client): Connected. PID:7, $0:bin/rails, session_name:web\\n\"},\"seq\":434}"
root@b032c5a1c83b:/app> # ^ exits

The application logs show:

DEBUGGER: Connected.
DEBUGGER: ReaderThreadError: wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1)
["/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server_dap.rb:504:in `puts'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:156:in `greeting'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:56:in `block (3 levels) in activate'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:54:in `synchronize'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:54:in `block (2 levels) in activate'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:506:in `block in accept'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:815:in `block (2 levels) in accept_loop'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:812:in `each'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:812:in `block in accept_loop'",
 "<internal:kernel>:187:in `loop'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:810:in `accept_loop'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:1170:in `block in unix_server_loop'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:1124:in `unix_server_socket'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3.0/socket.rb:1169:in `unix_server_loop'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:502:in `accept'",
 "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/debug-1.9.2/lib/debug/server.rb:49:in `block in activate'"]
DEBUGGER: Disconnected.
Vorherrschende Sprache
Ruby
Sterne
1.3k
Forks
146
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus ruby/debug

Alle Issues in ruby/debug

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Ruby

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.