content: assess a maintained MDX rendering path

Offen
  • Stimmt etwas nicht?
#76 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
25/100
Issue-Typ
Feature
Klarheit
Klar beschrieben
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
markdown, next.js, react, typescript
Bereich
backend, content, security

Rechercherichtung

Start with src/components/note-body.tsx, SAFE_MDX_OPTIONS, and the current next-mdx-remote dependency; compare maintained alternatives with a narrowly scoped maintenance strategy. Review the compatibility, licensing, runtime and bundle effects, maintenance cost, and issues #38 and #73 before documenting a choice. Done means the comparison supports the approach, safety and compatibility requirements are preserved, and the specified production-build and browser tests pass.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

dependencies enhancement help wanted

Maintenance finding

The upstream hashicorp/next-mdx-remote repository is archived as of this review (2026-11-10). This project currently pins version 6.0.0 and uses next-mdx-remote/rsc in src/components/note-body.tsx.

Sources: upstream repository and license. The current dependency audit reported no known production vulnerability; archival is a maintenance concern, not evidence of an active exploit.

Scope

  • Compare a maintained rendering approach with a narrowly scoped maintenance strategy for the current renderer. Record compatibility, licensing, bundle/runtime effects and maintenance cost before adding a replacement dependency.
  • Preserve SAFE_MDX_OPTIONS: reject raw HTML, JSX and expressions instead of evaluating or silently dropping them.
  • Preserve link/image sanitization, same-site image policy and filesystem/path isolation.
  • Keep the reviewed Markdown/MDX content contract, metadata, static generation and active dashboard/guide readers compatible.
  • Coordinate with #38 (Markdown tables) and #73 (legacy reader cleanup), so those tasks do not create a second rendering pipeline.
  • Document the selected approach and any migration steps; keep this separate from executing arbitrary student-supplied MDX.

Done when

A recorded comparison supports the chosen implementation, any new dependency is reviewed, and existing content safety, rendering, production-build and browser tests pass. Malicious HTML/JSX/expression and invalid-link fixtures remain rejected. Original learning content and its public URLs keep working.

Vorherrschende Sprache
TypeScript
Sterne
1
Forks
1
Ø Merge
8 Std. 58 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
37

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus procoderji-com/procoderji

Alle Issues in procoderji-com/procoderji

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu TypeScript

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.