Fedora-version of sysmonforlinux is failing (made for RHEL 8?)
@MarioHewardt arbeitet bereits daran.
Seit 02.4.2025.
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.
Beschreibung
Describe the issue
We are using https://packages.microsoft.com/fedora/41/prod/ as source for among other packes, fetching sysmonforliux. This program is failing on an actual Fedora 41 Linux machine. The rpm package has actually an «.el8» postfix, hinting this was made under RHEL 8. When fetching a "rhel/9/" version - the same apply with an extension of «.el8», but this will actually run OK on a RHEL 9 machine.
Originally title:
«sysmonforlinux at packages.microsoft.com/fedora/41/prod/Packages/s/ is made for RHEL 8»
at:
https://github.com/microsoft/linux-package-repositories/issues/211
When did the issue occur?
2025-04-01 (This is NOT a «april fools day» ticket ;-)
If applicable, what package did you attempt to install, and from which repo?
sysmonforlinux from this repo:
https://packages.microsoft.com/fedora/41/prod/Packages/s/
Steps to Reproduce
- Start with a «vanilla» Fedora 41
- Log in as root
- wget https://packages.microsoft.com/fedora/41/prod/Packages/s/
- grep sysmon index.html
- wget https://packages.microsoft.com/fedora/41/prod/Packages/s/sysmonforlinux-1.3.5-0.el8.x86_64.rpm
- dnf install -y sysmonforlinux-1.3.5-0.el8.x86_64.rpm
- systemctl status sysmon.service
- systemctl restart sysmon.service
- systemctl status sysmon.service
Actual Result
~ $ ssh hostwithfedora systemctl start sysmon.service
Job for sysmon.service failed because the control process exited with error code.
See "systemctl status sysmon.service" and "journalctl -xeu sysmon.service" for details.
~ $
~ $
~ $ ssh hostwithfedora journalctl -xeu sysmon.service
Apr 01 04:28:16 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: sysmon.service: Control process exited, code=exited, status=12/n/a
░░ Subject: Unit process exited
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░
░░ An ExecStart= process belonging to unit sysmon.service has exited.
░░
░░ The process' exit code is 'exited' and its exit status is 12.
Apr 01 04:28:16 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: sysmon.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
░░ Subject: Unit failed
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░
░░ The unit sysmon.service has entered the 'failed' state with result 'exit-code'.
Apr 01 04:28:16 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: Failed to start sysmon.service - Sysmon event logger.
░░ Subject: A start job for unit sysmon.service has failed
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░
░░ A start job for unit sysmon.service has finished with a failure.
░░
░░ The job identifier is 1192376 and the job result is failed.
Apr 01 04:28:16 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: sysmon.service: Consumed 313ms CPU time, 96.5M memory peak.
░░ Subject: Resources consumed by unit runtime
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░
░░ The unit sysmon.service completed and consumed the indicated resources.
Apr 01 04:28:26 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: sysmon.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 5.
░░ Subject: Automatic restarting of a unit has been scheduled
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░
░░ Automatic restarting of the unit sysmon.service has been scheduled, as the result for
░░ the configured Restart= setting for the unit.
Apr 01 04:28:26 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: sysmon.service: Start request repeated too quickly.
Apr 01 04:28:26 hostwithfedora systemd[1]: sysmon.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
░░ Subject: Unit failed
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Expected Result
The sysmon service should have started flawlessly
Screenshots
Additional context
The solution might be to compile the sysmonforlinux on a Fedora 41 platform, and build the rpm from there.
Note:
Fedora 42 is coming quite soon (04/24/2025 ?) and is already available as Beta, so please make a working sysmonforlinux for:
- RHEL 9
- Fedora 41
- Fedora 42
- also soon to be release: RHEL 10
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- C
- Sterne
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 224
- Ø Merge
- 4 Std. 50 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 3
Entwicklungsumgebung
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Keine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus microsoft/Sysmon-Linux
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
microsoft/Sysmon-Linux#253 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
microsoft/Sysmon-Linux#252 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 55/100
microsoft/Sysmon-Linux#247 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 12/100
microsoft/Sysmon-Linux#246 · 3 Kommentare ·
-
Sysmon service executable remains `(deleted)` after restart, causing repeated needrestart restarts and systemd start-limit-hitEvtl. wieder frei @MarioHewardt hat das vor 31 Tagen übernommen, und es ist kein Pull Request offen. Offen
microsoft/Sysmon-Linux#244 · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
Alle Issues in microsoft/Sysmon-Linux
Ähnliche Issues
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
-
bug multiplayer status: planned
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 67/100
ChupathingyCE/chupathingyce#851 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 73/100
HigherOrderCO/Bend#2104 ·
-
research-radar
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
good first issue help wanted program
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 83/100
hffgzktbcc-blip/ounce-core#297 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag