Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

[Task][RFC]: Complete Goal lifetime fencing and governed orphan recovery

Offen
  • Stimmt etwas nicht?
#5,206 6 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
25/100
Issue-Typ
Feature
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
python, typescript
Bereich
backend, distributed-systems

Rechercherichtung

Read the linked RFC and current owners/PRs first; implementation and integration overlap active work, so identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment before starting. The listed entry points are loopx/control_plane/goals/goal_instance_identity.ts, source_session_lifetime.ts, and loopx/control_plane/projects/registry_codec.py. Done means reconciling the accepted scope with the integrated revision and recording commands, passed/failed/untested evidence, and remaining gates; a merged PR alone is not completion.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

direction/architecture-evolution

Outcome / 目标

完成 Goal 生命周期隔离与孤儿状态恢复。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S2/S3/S9 · R5, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Integrated checkpoint: #5389, merge 3cecb0d7cbf3d247cfd996267d7fc64627bd6e49 (2026-10-02). The source-session lifetime transaction and individually qualified attached Chat, handoff and Turn-journal owners are already implemented; first-party host enforcement remains partial. Do not restart from the old codec-only checkpoint.

#5389 qualifies quota_settlement: exact GoalRef admission and ownership across spend/replay/receipt repair/void/readback, with legacy parity. Exact-head review: 231 Python and 279 TypeScript tests passed; 37 final-main integration tests passed; identical base/head public CLI and native artifact comparisons passed; risk-based premerge passed with 19 checks and no failures. These are isolated component/runtime results, not live product qualification.

execution_authority: false and the overall activation hold remain. Remaining inventory owners, old/warm-writer compatibility, external-effect drain, M4 recovery and packaged M5 acceptance are still open.

Product integration path / 产品联动路径

Canonical plan: RFC integration matrix · roadmap integration · golden-query lifecycle scenario.

  1. P0 / R1–R3 / G1: Goal 创建、Agent 创建或复用、2–3 worker 两轮依赖产物与 peer handoff、独立验收和同生命周期纠偏恢复。先在已支持 profile 验证；重连、换模型和新 Turn 不创建新的 Goal lifetime。
  2. P1 / S7 / R5: 实例归属接共享团队预算与 M4 孤儿恢复。共享额度分配仍由 quota/scheduler 验收，不能从实例隔离直接推导完成；恢复复用 preview/backup/apply/resume/readback。
  3. P2 / R6 / G3: 在真实跨主机认证、撤销与 lease 条件下验证迟到 worker，不把本地文件证据算作远端资格。

M5 的隔离重建场景必须等选定 profile 的 M2/M3 owner、旧 writer 与 drain 门槛满足后运行；涉及孤儿处置时包含 M4。检查 A 退役、B 同名重建、迟到 A 与重复回调不会污染 B，B 和无关 Goal 继续推进，结果回到原入口。App + 独立 CLI/source 回读先验，Lark 单独资格化。Component fixtures can precede activation but cannot certify the live journey. Use existing R1–R3/G1 owners under #4574; this issue owns the lifetime/recovery dependency, not a parallel team-orchestration ledger.

Work remaining

  • Finish the current binding-owner inventory and remaining admission/commit fences using the source registry’s exact GoalRef.
  • Complete preview/backup/journal/apply/resume/readback for supported orphan dispositions with explicit activation and compatibility boundaries.

Ownership and ongoing work

Reuse #4800/#4915 for paths and #3245 for authority promotion. Do not reimplement delivered source-session transactions or take over the active migration writers. Record remaining binding families, not an obsolete codec-only status.

Contribution route: implementation/integration overlaps active work. Start from the linked current owners/PRs and identify an unowned acceptance gap in a claim comment; do not begin a competing rewrite.

Acceptance

  • Delete/recreate of one alias cannot accept old session, inbox, host or execution authority; late A results cannot settle B.
  • Concurrent retirement, stale global projections, crash recovery and ambiguous commit preserve exact original identity and receipts.
  • Recovery never guesses a candidate or mutates active state as a test; isolated real-provider evidence and CLI/product readback cover the advertised path.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
6.2k
Forks
596
Ø Merge
7 Std. 47 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
904

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus loopx-project/loopx

Alle Issues in loopx-project/loopx

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Python

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.