Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

[Task][RFC]: Complete external-evidence research through real providers and user readback

Offen
  • Stimmt etwas nicht?
#5,205 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
35/100
Issue-Typ
Feature
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
python, typescript
Bereich
ai-infra-agents

Rechercherichtung

Start with the canonical RFC and the existing owner in loopx/control_plane/capabilities/external_evidence.ts, then inspect the CLI commands and apps/presentation/dashboard entrypoints named in the issue. Identify one bounded milestone and exact files before proposing work, coordinating with the current App research delivery. Verify a real authorized provider path and CLI/UI readback; document commands, passed/failed/untested evidence, and remaining gates without claiming a merged PR completes the RFC.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

direction/architecture-evolution help wanted

Outcome / 目标

完成外部证据研究的真实 provider 与用户回读。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S6/S8, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

#4813 shipped discover/plan/receipt/admit/retire through a typed TS owner and CLI. The RFC explicitly distinguishes observing a caller-presented receipt from proving provider execution, and names frontend/Lark as companion work.

Work remaining

  • Reuse the exact-plan lifecycle with one existing research method and one supported connector where needed; retain their own execution/permission owners.
  • Expose the same plan, source provenance, parent admission, downstream use and retirement facts in the affected product entrypoints.

Ownership and ongoing work

Coordinate with capability Portfolio and current App research delivery. This issue completes this RFC’s evidence lifecycle; it does not create a browser, connector registry, new scheduler or another evidence authority.

Contribution route: available for a bounded proposal/PR within this RFC. Name the intended milestone and exact files in a claim comment so simultaneous contributors do not duplicate work.

Acceptance

  • Inventory-only or stale providers cannot be selected as ready; plan/receipt/admission mutation is rejected.
  • Partial, empty and failed evidence preserve the caller’s original-source fallback; admission and downstream coverage are independently shown.
  • Demonstrate a real authorized provider path and actual CLI/UI readback without automatic evidence acceptance or raw-content leakage.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
6.2k
Forks
596
Ø Merge
6 Std. 44 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
915

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus loopx-project/loopx

Alle Issues in loopx-project/loopx

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Python

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.