pick_first (legacy): channel permanently stuck in READY with a stale picker after resolver refresh burst during transient network failure; wait-for-ready RPCs black-hole until deadline
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 45/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Tech-Stack
- java
- Bereich
- backend-api-design, networking
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit io.grpc.internal.PickFirstLoadBalancer und führe die angehängte BurstRepro.java, das Treiberskript und den Proxy aus, um die READY- und CONNECTING-Blockaden zu reproduzieren. Vergleiche das Legacy-Verhalten mit den PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer-Logs in logs/run2-READY-signature/ und logs/run3-newpf-no-wedge/. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die Legacy-Richtlinie keinen READY-Kanal mit einem nicht mehr funktionierenden Picker zurücklässt und die wait-for-ready-Probe entweder wiederhergestellt wird oder sichtbar fehlschlägt.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
grpc-java-pickfirst-wedge.tar.gz
What version of gRPC-Java are you using?
1.76.2 (grpc-netty, netty 4.1.136.Final)
What is your environment?
Linux, Java 17 (also observed under Java 11 in production).
Load balancing policy: pick_first (single-address target).
Active LB implementation: legacy io.grpc.internal.PickFirstLoadBalancer (its
RequestConnectionPicker appears in the channel logs; the new
PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer was not enabled — see "Additional data point" below).
What did you expect to see?
After a transient network failure heals, a pick_first channel either recovers or
transitions out of READY so that the LB policy or the application (via
notifyWhenStateChanged) can react.
What did you see instead?
The channel is left permanently reporting READY while every RPC — including
withWaitForReady() RPCs — buffers forever and fails only by its own deadline:
DEADLINE_EXCEEDED: ... Name resolution delay 0 ... [buffered_nanos=..., waiting_for_connection]
No channel state transition ever fires again, so nothing can observe that the channel
is broken. ManagedChannel.enterIdle() reliably recovers it.
Mechanism, from FINEST ChannelLogger logs (attached):
- The transport to the current address dies (TLS handshakes reset — in production,
a rolling container upgrade left the port published while the backend reset
handshakes for ~10 seconds). - gRPC's reconnect logic calls
NameResolver.refresh()repeatedly. The resolver
answers asynchronously with a mix ofonErrorandonResultdeliveries (it is
backed by a discovery service that sits behind the same failing network, so
deliveries arrive out of order relative to subchannel state changes). - Each
onResultcausesPickFirstLoadBalancerto create a replacement subchannel
and schedule delayed shutdown (~5s) of the previous one. - Within the delayed-shutdown window, the old subchannel completes its connection
against the recovering backend and reaches READY; the LB publishes a READY picker
referencing it. - The delayed shutdown then fires (
SHUTDOWN with UNAVAILABLE(Subchannel shutdown invoked)), terminating the transport — but the published READY picker is never
replaced. The channel stays READY forever with a picker whose subchannel has no
transport.
Steps to reproduce the bug
Self-contained repro attached: one Java file (BurstRepro.java, only grpc-java +
netty dependencies, in-process backend server), a small Python TCP proxy that models
the network failure (reset mode: accept + immediately close, emulating TLS resets),
and a driver script. Typically reproduces within a few iterations.
Per iteration: verify a healthy RPC through the proxy, switch the proxy to reset
for a few seconds (driving reconnect/backoff and resolver refreshes), heal the proxy,
then probe with a withWaitForReady() RPC with a deadline.
Two wedge variants observed:
logs/run2-READY-signature/— channel READY, wait-for-ready probe black-holes to
DEADLINE_EXCEEDED;enterIdle()immediately recovers it. This matches our
production incident signature.logs/run1-connecting-wedge/— channel wedged in CONNECTING with no reconnect
attempt scheduled.
Additional data point: the new PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer does not wedge
Running the identical repro with GRPC_EXPERIMENTAL_ENABLE_NEW_PICK_FIRST=true
(confirmed active: PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer in the logs), the permanent black-hole
does not reproduce in 40 iterations. The same post-burst sequence still leaves the
channel claiming READY while the picked transport is dead, but the RPC fails fast
with UNAVAILABLE and gRPC immediately schedules a resolver refresh, after which the
channel recovers (logs/run3-newpf-no-wedge/).
So the catastrophic silent wedge appears specific to the legacy
PickFirstLoadBalancer. Since the new PF also has a known stuck-in-IDLE issue
(#12395) with a draft fix that appears stalled (#12403), may we suggest revisiting
that PR — fixing #12395 and graduating the new PF would retire both wedge variants,
whereas today users are stuck choosing between a legacy PF with this READY wedge and
an experimental PF with a known IDLE wedge.
Related issues
- #12395 —
PickFirstLeafLoadBalancerstuck in IDLE on backend address change (Java
analog of grpc/grpc-go#8615). Same family: LB internal state diverging from the
published picker when a resolver update races a subchannel state change. Differs
in that it wedges in IDLE and affects the new leaf PF; this report is the legacy
PF wedging in READY, which is strictly worse (wait-for-ready RPCs black-hole and
no observable state ever changes). - #11082 — PF not emitting TRANSIENT_FAILURE (missed state propagation).
- #11227 — NPE from inconsistent PF internal state after resolution errors (fixed in
1.66); shows the resolver-error path mutating LB state non-atomically.
Production impact
Our etcd-backed auth-service channel black-holed all RPCs for 60+ seconds (until
process restart) during a rolling upgrade. The server saw zero incoming RPCs during
the window while the client channel claimed READY throughout. We now run an
application-level watchdog that calls enterIdle() when RPCs time out while the
channel claims READY.
Attachment
grpc-java-pickfirst-wedge.tar.gz — repro sources, driver, and FINEST channel logs
for all three runs described above.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Java
- Sterne
- 12.1k
- Forks
- 4k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 3 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 30
Entwicklungsumgebung
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus grpc/grpc-java
-
enhancement
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 88/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
grpc/grpc-java#13052 · 4 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
-
docs enhancement
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
grpc/grpc-java#10824 · 8 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 65/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 88/100
checkstyle/checkstyle#21755 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 84/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
agentic-workflows
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
github/copilot-sdk#2782 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
documentation Good for newcomer quick win
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
CodeForPhilly/benefit-decision-toolkit#519 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
area-deployment triage:bot-seen triage:needs-human
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
microsoft/aspire#20533 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag