Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

[rig-decomposition-bench] Daily rig decomposition benchmark — 2026-10-24 — no winner (picker failed)

Offen
#714 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
2/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-3 Stunden
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
50/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
github-actions, typescript

Rechercherichtung

Start with the task picker definition and the workflow call in the embedded bench.ts; inspect how call(picker, ...) handles a null result and how repair() is configured. Reproduce the run-once failure and identify a concrete change that lets the benchmark continue or report a useful failure. Done when the picker failure is handled as intended and a run records a clear outcome; the issue does not specify a fix or a test.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

ai-agent automation

Result: benchmark failed at the task-picker step

The task picker (small agent with repair(), maxTurns: 2) returned null, so the workflow returned early. Per the run-once rule it was not retried.

Captured stdout (bench_output.json):

{
  "error": "task picker returned null",
  "status": "fail"
}

Captured stderr: empty (0 bytes). Exit code was 0.

Typecheck note: --typecheck reported no errors in the benchmark program itself. It did print errors from rig.ts and engines/* (missing @types/node / NodeJS types), and the same errors appear for a trivial one-agent program.

Task

Not chosen (picker returned null).

Timing comparison
single-call (ms) decomposed (ms) decomposed status
not run not run fail (never started)
Decomposition attempts

None. There was no task to give the writer.

Grading

Not run. There are no scores, no winner and no rationale.

Single-call solution

Not produced.

Decomposed program source and solution

Not produced.

Benchmark program (bench.ts)
import { agent, workflow, s, configureAgent, copilotEngine, repair } from "rig";

configureAgent(copilotEngine());

const DEADLINE = Date.now() + 25 * 60_000;
const left = () => DEADLINE - Date.now();

const SKELETON = `import { agent, workflow, s } from "rig";

// Agent role: <role>
const analyze = agent({ model: "small", instructions: "...", output: s.string });

// Workflow role: combines the agents' outputs into the final solution
export default workflow({
  meta: { name: "decomposed-solution", description: "..." },
  body: async ({ call }) => {
    const analysis = await call(analyze, "...");
    return { solution: analysis ?? "" };
  },
});`;

const RULES = `Rules for the rig program (you have no access to the library docs, follow these exactly):
- Import only from "rig". Export the root via \`export default\` and never invoke it. The root takes no required input.
- A workflow() spec accepts only meta, an optional input, and body. It has NO output or execute field; the final { solution } object is simply what body returns.
- An agent() root instead declares output: s.object({ solution: s.string }).
- agent() fields: name, instructions, input, output, model ("small" | "medium" | "large"), maxTurns, addons, agents, tools.
- Inside body({ call, parallel, pipeline }): call(agent, input) returns the output or null on failure; parallel([thunks]) runs thunks concurrently.
- Use at least two agents, each preceded by a "// Agent role: ..." comment; use "small" for simple sub-steps, "medium" or "large" for harder ones. Put a "// Workflow role: ..." comment above the workflow.
- The final answer must combine the agents' outputs, not come from one agent solving everything.
- Use s.string for every agent whose result is source text or free-form solution; do not make agents re-emit a large solution inside an object wrapper.
- Do not use console.log. Return ONLY the complete TypeScript source, optionally in one \`\`\`ts fence.
Required shape (abridged to one agent; you need at least two):
${SKELETON}`;

const picker = agent({
  name: "picker",
  model: "small",
  maxTurns: 2,
  addons: [repair()],
  instructions:
    "Pick ONE concrete, complicated task a person or team might face in a single day that would naturally benefit from being split across sub-agents running different models: multi-source research and synthesis, a multi-file coding task with design/implementation/review phases, a structured report combining independent analyses, or a multi-step data transformation pipeline. It must be self-contained (solvable from its description alone, no external files or live web access) and concrete enough to grade. Vary the domain; pick randomly. Return title, domain, description, and 3-6 concrete checkable success criteria.",
  output: s.object({
    title: s.string,
    domain: s.string,
    description: s.string,
    criteria: s.array(s.string),
  }),
});

// Agent role: solves the whole task alone in one turn
const solver = agent({
  name: "solver",
  model: "medium",
  maxTurns: 1,
  instructions:
    "Solve the entire task yourself in one response, addressing every success criterion explicitly. No delegation, no tools. Return the complete solution verbatim.",
  output: s.string,
});

// Agent role: writes (and fixes) the decomposed rig program
const writer = agent({
  name: "writer",
  model: "medium",
  maxTurns: 1,
  instructions:
    "You write self-contained rig TypeScript programs that solve a task by splitting it across multiple agents.\n" + RULES,
  output: s.string,
});

// Agent role: grades both solutions
const grader = agent({
  name: "grader",
  model: "large",
  maxTurns: 1,
  instructions:
    "Score each solution 0-10 on how completely and correctly it satisfies the success criteria. Judge only correctness and completeness of content, not length and not which approach produced it. Pick winner single-call, decomposed, or tie and explain the comparison.",
  output: s.object({
    singleScore: s.number,
    decomposedScore: s.number,
    winner: s.enum("single-call", "decomposed", "tie"),
    rationale: s.string,
  }),
});

type Attempt = {
  attempt: number;
  generation: string;
  typecheck: string;
  execute: string;
  error: string;
};

function stripFence(src: string): string {
  const m = src.match(/```(?:ts|typescript|rig)?\s*\n([\s\S]*?)```/);
  return (m ? m[1] : src).trim();
}

async function runCli(args: string[], input: string, timeoutMs: number) {
  const modName: string = "node:child_process";
  const { spawn } = (await import(modName)) as any;
  const proc = (globalThis as any).process;
  return new Promise<{ code: number | null; stdout: string; stderr: string; timedOut: boolean }>((resolve) => {
    const child = spawn("node", ["rig.ts", ...args], { cwd: proc.cwd() });
    let stdout = "";
    let stderr = "";
    let timedOut = false;
    const t = setTimeout(() => {
      timedOut = true;
      child.kill("SIGKILL");
    }, Math.max(1000, timeoutMs));
    child.stdout.on("data", (d: any) => (stdout += d.toString()));
    child.stderr.on("data", (d: any) => (stderr += d.toString()));
    child.on("error", (e: Error) => {
      clearTimeout(t);
      resolve({ code: -1, stdout, stderr: stderr + String(e), timedOut });
    });
    child.on("close", (code: number | null) => {
      clearTimeout(t);
      resolve({ code, stdout, stderr, timedOut });
    });
    child.stdin.on("error", () => {});
    child.stdin.end(input);
  });
}

// Workflow role: pick a task, solve it two ways, grade, and return the report
export default workflow({
  meta: { name: "decomposition-bench", description: "Single-call vs decomposed rig solution benchmark" },
  body: async ({ call }) => {
    const task = await call(picker, "Pick the task now.", { label: "pick" });
    if (!task) return { error: "task picker returned null", status: "fail" };
    const taskText = `Title: ${task.title}\nDomain: ${task.domain}\nDescription: ${task.description}\nSuccess criteria:\n${task.criteria.map((c: string, i: number) => `${i + 1}. ${c}`).join("\n")}`;

    const t0 = Date.now();
    const singleSolution = (await call(solver, taskText, { label: "single", timeout: Math.min(8 * 60_000, Math.max(30_000, left())) })) ?? "";
    const singleMs = Date.now() - t0;

    const d0 = Date.now();
    const attempts: Attempt[] = [];
    let source = "";
    let decomposedSolution = "";
    let status = "fail";
    let prevSource = "";
    let prevError = "";
    for (let n = 1; n <= 2; n++) {
      if (left() < 4 * 60_000) break;
      let prompt: string;
      if (n === 1) {
        prompt = `Write the decomposed rig program for this task.\n\n${taskText}`;
      } else if (prevSource.trim()) {
        prompt = `Fix this rig program. Fix precisely what the error names and preserve what already worked.\n\nTask:\n${taskText}\n\nCurrent source:\n${prevSource}\n\nCaptured error:\n${prevError}\n\nRequired skeleton:\n${SKELETON}`;
      } else {
        prompt = `There is no source to fix: the previous attempt produced nothing. Generate the complete program from scratch.\n\nTask:\n${taskText}\n\nRequired skeleton:\n${SKELETON}`;
      }
      const raw = await call(writer, prompt, { label: `writer-${n}`, timeout: Math.min(6 * 60_000, Math.max(30_000, left())) });
      const rec: Attempt = { attempt: n, generation: "", typecheck: "skipped", execute: "skipped", error: "" };
      attempts.push(rec);
      const src = raw ? stripFence(raw) : "";
      if (!src.trim()) {
        rec.generation = "empty/null";
        prevSource = "";
        prevError = "empty source";
        continue;
      }
      rec.generation = "ok";
      source = src;
      prevSource = src;
      const tc = await runCli(["--typecheck"], src, Math.min(2 * 60_000, left()));
      if (tc.code !== 0 || tc.timedOut) {
        rec.typecheck = tc.timedOut ? "timeout" : "fail";
        rec.error = `${tc.stdout}\n${tc.stderr}`.trim() || "typecheck failed";
        prevError = rec.error;
        continue;
      }
      rec.typecheck = "pass";
      if (left() < 30_000) { rec.execute = "skipped (no time)"; break; }
      const ex = await runCli(["--server"], src, Math.min(5 * 60_000, left()));
      if (ex.code !== 0 || ex.timedOut) {
        rec.execute = ex.timedOut ? "timeout" : "fail";
        rec.error = `${ex.stderr}\n${ex.stdout}`.trim() || "execute failed";
        prevError = rec.error;
        continue;
      }
      try {
        const parsed = JSON.parse(ex.stdout);
        const sol = parsed?.solution ?? parsed?.output?.solution ?? parsed?.result?.solution;
        if (typeof sol === "string" && sol.trim()) {
          rec.execute = "pass";
          decomposedSolution = sol;
          status = "pass";
          break;
        }
        rec.execute = "fail";
        rec.error = `No solution string in stdout: ${ex.stdout.slice(0, 4000)}`;
      } catch (e) {
        rec.execute = "fail";
        rec.error = `Invalid JSON stdout: ${String(e)}\n${ex.stdout.slice(0, 4000)}`;
      }
      prevError = rec.error;
    }
    const decomposedMs = Date.now() - d0;

    const decomposedForGrading = decomposedSolution.trim() || "(Decomposition produced no solution.)";
    let grade: { singleScore: number; decomposedScore: number; winner: string; rationale: string } | null = null;
    if (left() > 30_000) {
      grade = await call(
        grader,
        `${taskText}\n\n=== SOLUTION A (single-call) ===\n${singleSolution || "(empty)"}\n\n=== SOLUTION B (decomposed) ===\n${decomposedForGrading}`,
        { label: "grade", timeout: Math.min(5 * 60_000, Math.max(30_000, left())) },
      );
    }

    return {
      task,
      singleMs,
      decomposedMs,
      singleSolution,
      decomposedSolution,
      attempts,
      status,
      decomposedSource: source,
      grade,
    };
  },
});

Verdict: no winner. The picker returned null on this run, so the benchmark produced no data.

Generated by Daily Rig Decomposition Benchmark · copilot · auto · ~37 AIC · ⌖ ~1 AIC · ⊞ 4.1K · ◷

  • expires on Oct 31, 2026, 1:03 PM UTC
Vorherrschende Sprache
TypeScript
Sterne
14
Forks
0
Ø Merge
9 Std. 27 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
34

Entwicklungsumgebung

Dieses Projekt bietet weder Dev-Container noch Dockerfile noch Beitragsleitfaden – die Einrichtung liegt bei Ihnen. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus githubnext/rig

Alle Issues in githubnext/rig

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu TypeScript

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.