[Extension]: Add AttackTree (v0.1.0)
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 1/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Unter einer Stunde
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 72/100
Rechercherichtung
Lies zunächst das Format des Erweiterungskatalogs und benachbarte Erweiterungseinträge. Finde dann heraus, wo Katalogeinreichungen hinzugefügt und validiert werden. Prüfe, ob die Metadaten dieser Einreichung dem erwarteten Schema entsprechen. Fertig ist die Aufgabe, wenn der AttackTree-Eintrag mit den bereitgestellten Details hinzugefügt wurde und die Katalogvalidierung erfolgreich ist.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Extension ID
attacktree
Extension Name
AttackTree
Version
0.1.0
Description
Attack trees with attacker profiles, AND/OR path simulation, control roadmaps, and control-to-test traceability
Author
hupe1980
Repository URL
https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree
Download URL
https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.0.zip
License
MIT
Homepage (optional)
https://hupe1980.github.io/spec-kit-attacktree/
Documentation URL (optional)
https://hupe1980.github.io/spec-kit-attacktree/docs/
Changelog URL (optional)
https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
Required Spec Kit Version
=1.0.0
Required Tools (optional)
- python (>=3.11) with PyYAML - required, unless uv is available
- uv - optional; the wrappers use it to fetch PyYAML and jsonschema when no suitable Python is found
- jsonschema (Python package) - optional; enables full JSON Schema validation
Number of Commands
4
Number of Hooks (optional)
7
Tags
security, attack-trees, threat-modeling, risk-simulation, traceability
Key Features
- Builds
attack-tree.yamlfromspec.mdandplan.md: threat actors with capabilities, attacker goals with business impact, AND/OR paths, rated attack vectors, and security controls - Simulates the tree with Schneier's propagation rules and attacker-profile feasibility: most likely and cheapest path per actor, residual risk per goal, choke points, single points of failure, what-if per control, a cost-ranked roadmap, and a seeded Monte Carlo
- Publishes controls as testable
CR-###requirements with Given/When/Then acceptance intospec.md - 16 deterministic checks (A1–A16) plus semantic review, with Markdown, JSON, and SARIF output; a bundled GitHub Action uploads to code scanning
- Evidence-based convergence: verdicts from tests, reviews, or micro attack simulations, measured bypass rates for probabilistic controls, residual risk from verified controls only, and remediation tasks appended to
tasks.md - Agentic profile with five attack-surface zones and references to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM and Agentic Applications 2026 and MITRE ATLAS
- Optional Open Threat Model (OTM) import; seven optional lifecycle hooks; a companion preset and workflow
- The engine needs no LLM: a single Python script that runs in CI
Testing Checklist
- Extension installs successfully via download URL
- All commands execute without errors
- Documentation is complete and accurate
- No security vulnerabilities identified
- Tested on at least one real project
Submission Requirements
- Valid
extension.ymlmanifest included - README.md with installation and usage instructions
- LICENSE file included
- GitHub release created with version tag
- All command files exist and are properly formatted
- Extension ID follows naming conventions (lowercase-with-hyphens)
Testing Details
Tested on:
- macOS (Darwin 25) with Spec Kit 1.0.7, Python 3.11, 3.13, and 3.14
- CI: Ubuntu and Windows, Python 3.11 and 3.13
Test project: scratch project from specify init --integration claude, plus the shipped example examples/agent-assistant
Test scenarios:
- Manifest validated with
specify_cli.extensions.ExtensionManifest(4 commands, 7 hooks, no warnings) specify extension add --devinto the scratch project: the 4 skills were registered, the config was scaffolded, and the hooks were written to.specify/extensions.yml- Companion preset and workflow installed with
specify preset addandspecify workflow add - The engine run on the example: validate, render, check (md, json, sarif), simulate (all scenarios, what-if, Monte Carlo), converge-scan, converge-apply
- Test suite: 132 tests, including 40 seeded randomized property tests of the propagation rules
- The release workflow smoke-installs the built archive with
specify extension add --from
Example Usage
# Install
specify extension add attacktree --from https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.0.zip
# In your agent, after /speckit-specify
/speckit.attacktree.model
# After /speckit-plan
/speckit.attacktree.model --from-plan
/speckit.attacktree.simulate
# After /speckit-tasks
/speckit.attacktree.check
# After /speckit-implement
/speckit.attacktree.converge
# Or without an agent, e.g. in CI
.specify/extensions/attacktree/scripts/bash/attacktree.sh check --format sarif --output attacktree.sarif
.specify/extensions/attacktree/scripts/bash/attacktree.sh simulate --scenario current
Proposed Catalog Entry
{
"attacktree": {
"name": "AttackTree — Attack Tree Modeling & Control Simulation",
"id": "attacktree",
"description": "Attack trees with attacker profiles, AND/OR path simulation, control roadmaps, and control-to-test traceability",
"author": "hupe1980",
"version": "0.1.0",
"download_url": "https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.0.zip",
"repository": "https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree",
"homepage": "https://hupe1980.github.io/spec-kit-attacktree/",
"documentation": "https://hupe1980.github.io/spec-kit-attacktree/docs/",
"changelog": "https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md",
"license": "MIT",
"requires": {
"speckit_version": ">=1.0.0"
},
"provides": {
"commands": 4,
"hooks": 7
},
"tags": ["security", "attack-trees", "threat-modeling", "risk-simulation", "traceability"],
"verified": false,
"downloads": 0,
"stars": 0,
"created_at": "2026-10-05T00:00:00Z",
"updated_at": "2026-10-05T00:00:00Z"
}
}
Additional Context
AttackTree brings attack-tree threat modelling (Schneier 1999; Christian Schneider's scenario-driven practice at attacktree.online) into Spec-Driven Development. The agent builds the tree and judges evidence; a deterministic Python engine does all propagation, simulation, and checks, so results are reproducible and CI-ready. All hooks are optional, and core commands are unchanged unless the optional preset is installed. Interop is limited to open standards: OTM import, SARIF output, and a JSON Schema for the tree.
- Docs and landing page: https://hupe1980.github.io/spec-kit-attacktree/
- Worked example: https://github.com/hupe1980/spec-kit-attacktree/tree/main/examples/agent-assistant
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 139k
- Forks
- 12.5k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 167
Entwicklungsumgebung
Startet den Dev-Container des Projekts im Browser, mit Ihrem eigenen GitHub-Konto.
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Hat eine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus github/spec-kit
-
feature-assess feature-go triage-can-wait
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
github/spec-kit#4804 · 6 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
needs-triage triage-nice-to-have
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
github/spec-kit#4527 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
[Bug]: specify init writes speckit.manifest.json without the speckit-converge skill it just installedEvtl. wieder frei Ein Pull Request dazu wurde ohne Merge geschlossen. Offenbug-assess severity-medium
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
github/spec-kit#4273 · 3 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
[Bug]: /speckit-implement counts checkbox markers inside fenced code blocks — example checkboxes can falsely block implementationEvtl. vergeben @ntdatt812 hat das vor 25 Tagen übernommen. Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 84/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
[Extension]: Jira Integration (Sync Engine) v0.5.0 (version update of jira-sync)Evtl. vergeben @github-actions hat das vor 50 Tagen übernommen. Offenextension-submission validation-passed
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
github/spec-kit#4099 · 3 Kommentare ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in github/spec-kit
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
Juniper/ansible-junos-stdlib#904 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
pollen-robotics/reachy_mini#1457 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
area:runtime good first issue
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
WATonomous/wato_f1tenth#39 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
FireDynamics/fdsreader#123 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 85/100