Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

BYOK (Mistral): session dies with bare "422 Unprocessable Entity" on the first tool call — assistant message sends both `content` and `tool_calls`

Offen
#3,979 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
48/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Bereich
api, desktop

Rechercherichtung

Begin with the CLI engine's runAgenticLoop entry point named in the report, then trace the session.error and errorOccurred handling used by the app's session error panel. Reproduce with a Mistral custom provider using devstral-latest or zai-glm-5-2 and a tool-call prompt. Done means the agentic session continues past the first tool call and the provider response body is visible in the error details.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Short summary

Sessions using a BYOK/custom Mistral model die with an undiagnosable "Unprocessable Entity" as soon as the model makes its first tool call

Affected version or release

1.1.21 (Windows desktop app; bundled CLI engine 1.0.85, also reproduced on 1.0.80)

Installation context

Local desktop app on Windows 11 (x86_64), personal account, worktree-backed repository sessions. Custom model provider configured against the Mistral API (https://api.mistral.ai).

What happened?

I configured the app with a Mistral API key as a custom model provider. The connection works — the app successfully enumerates the available models and they show up in the model picker (mistral-medium-latest, devstral-latest, ministral-8b-latest, zai-glm-5-2).

But every session I start with one of those models fails almost immediately. The session UI shows:

Unprocessable Entity
Error details: 422 Unprocessable Entity

…and nothing else. The session is dead at that point. Screenshot attached below in context: the worktree is created, the session starts, the model answers with one sentence and successfully calls rename_branch, and then the turn collapses into the 422.

Digging into the local logs, the app/CLI is sending a request shape Mistral rejects. The first model call succeeds; the second one — the one replaying the assistant turn plus the tool result — is rejected in ~0.16s. The cause is that the assistant message is serialized with both a non-empty content and tool_calls, which Mistral's API explicitly disallows ("must have either content or tool_calls, but not both").

This correlates perfectly across three local sessions against the same provider, one of which works:

Model (same Mistral provider) First assistant message Result
mistral-medium-latest "content": "" + toolRequests ✅ works
devstral-latest "content": "I'll help you…" + toolRequests ❌ 422
zai-glm-5-2 "content": "I'll analyze this repository…" + toolRequests ❌ 422

The only variable is whether the model happened to emit a preamble sentence alongside the tool call — which the user cannot control — so in practice any Mistral BYOK model is unusable for agentic sessions.

There are two distinct app-side problems here:

  1. The request shape is invalid for this provider. Tracked in detail against the CLI engine as github/copilot-cli#4884; filing here too because this is where users hit it (the model picker offers models that then reliably fail on first tool call).
  2. The error surfaced in the session UI is unactionable. "422 Unprocessable Entity" with no provider response body means there is no way to tell whether this is a bad key, an unsupported model, a quota problem or a malformed payload. The provider's error body should be shown in the error details panel. I only found the cause by reading ~/.copilot/otel/copilot-otel.jsonl and ~/.copilot/session-state/<id>/events.jsonl by hand.

Secondary issue that will surface next once the above is fixed: Mistral validates tool_call_id as exactly 9 alphanumeric characters. Native Mistral models return compliant ids (KkQq9A6FI, GrkR6lLMv), but zai-glm-5-2 hosted on the same endpoint returns vLLM-style ids such as chatcmpl-tool-aae20b13990bb75a, which Mistral's own validator rejects on the follow-up request.

Steps to reproduce
  1. Add a custom model provider in the app pointing at https://api.mistral.ai with a valid Mistral API key. Note that model discovery works — the models are listed in the picker.
  2. Create a new repository session and select devstral-latest (or zai-glm-5-2).
  3. Send a prompt that requires a tool call, e.g. analyze this repo for me.
  4. Watch the model reply with a sentence and run one tool successfully (e.g. rename_branch).
  5. The session immediately fails with 422 Unprocessable Entity and stops.
Expected behavior

The session should continue through the agentic loop. When targeting a provider that disallows an assistant message carrying both content and tool_calls, the client should split them into two messages (or drop/relocate the preamble text) rather than sending a payload the provider rejects.

Independently of that fix: the session error panel should surface the provider's HTTP response body, not just the bare status line, so a BYOK misconfiguration can be told apart from a provider-side rejection.

Additional context

From ~/.copilot/session-state/<session-id>/events.jsonl — the assistant message that triggers it:

{"type":"assistant.message","data":{"model":"zai-glm-5-2",
 "content":"I'll analyze this repository for you. Let me start by exploring its structure and key files.",
 "toolRequests":[{"toolCallId":"chatcmpl-tool-aae20b13990bb75a","name":"rename_branch",
 "arguments":{"name":"analyze-repo-structure"},"type":"function"}]}}

The tool then executes successfully (tool.execution_complete, success: true), assistant.turn_start fires for turn 1, and immediately:

{"type":"session.error","data":{"errorType":"query","message":"422 Unprocessable Entity","statusCode":422}}
{"type":"hook.start","data":{"hookType":"errorOccurred","input":{"error":{"message":"\"422 Unprocessable Entity\""},"errorContext":"model_call","recoverable":true}}}
{"type":"hook.start","data":{"hookType":"sessionEnd","input":{"reason":"error","error":{"message":"422 Unprocessable Entity"}}}}

Note recoverable: true on the errorOccurred hook, yet the session is ended with reason: "error".

From ~/.copilot/otel/copilot-otel.jsonl — first call succeeded, second failed:

gen_ai.client.token.usage   provider=openai  server.address=api.mistral.ai
  gen_ai.request.model=<provider-id>/zai-glm-5-2  gen_ai.response.model=zai-glm-5-2
  input=48464  output=34                       <- first call, OK

gen_ai.client.operation.duration  error.type=SessionTurnError
  gen_ai.operation.name=invoke_agent  server.address=api.mistral.ai
  duration=0.158s (no gen_ai.response.model)   <- second call, 422

The app-side log (~/.copilot/logs/github-app.<pid>.log) shows the session being created normally with no hint of the failure:

github_app::session::manager::lifecycle: retained CLI for session creation
  requested_model="zai-glm-5-2" remote_enabled=false
github_app::session::manager::lifecycle: fetched available models for session creation
  requested_model="<provider-id>/zai-glm-5-2" model_count=30 auto_available=true

The stack trace captured in the error hook is unhelpful on current builds (napi_register_module_v1 frames only); on CLI 1.0.80 it pointed at runAgenticLoop in app.js.

Related: github/copilot-cli#4884 (same root cause, filed against the CLI engine).
Reference for the Mistral constraint: langchain-ai/langchain#21196.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Keine Sprachdaten
Sterne
2.2k
Forks
174
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus github/app

Alle Issues in github/app

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Backend & API Design

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.