Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

Copilot Agent sometimes replaces contents of one file with contents of another file

Offen
#617 5 Kommentare 2 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
28/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Muss geklärt werden
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Tech-Stack
macos, swift

Rechercherichtung

Beginne mit der Durchsicht der verlinkten Logs und vergleiche den Diff-Viewer der Chat-UI mit den in Xcode's git view angezeigten Änderungen. Konzentriere dich auf Agent-Bearbeitungen über mehrere Dateien hinweg und auf das Verhalten nach der Eingabe von „continue“; abgeschlossen ist die Aufgabe, wenn das Problem reproduziert wurde und sichergestellt ist, dass jede Datei ihre vorgesehenen Änderungen erhält, ohne dass der Inhalt einer anderen Datei sie ersetzt.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

reviewed

Describe the bug
Sometimes when Copilot Agent mode works on a more complicated task, it can happen that the contents of one file are replaced with the contents of another file.

One example: Say we have some files A, B and C that Copilot tries to edit.
Copilot successfully suggests edits for all three files, but looking at the changes actually applied to Xcode only files A and B have the correct changes applied, while C now also contains the same code as for example B.

Versions

  • Copilot for Xcode: 0.44.0
  • Xcode: 26.0.1
  • macOS: 26.1 (happend on 26.0 as well)

Steps to reproduce

  1. Ask an Agent to perform some more complicated changes in a non-small code base.
  2. Watch as the changes are applied incorrectly.

Screenshots
correct edits in the chat ui diff viewer, but incorrectly applied when viewed from the Xcode git view:
Image

after typing continue, the previous changes are applied automatically and the new changes are applied incorrectly once again:
Image

Logs
Here are the logs from the time frame I've tried to reproduce the issue.
The stuff further down is probably more relevant, as I wasn't immediately able to reproduce it.
However, I don't really know what part of these logs actually contains useful information.

Additional context
Interestingly, opening the suggested changes from the chat ui (see example above), the changes for file A, B and C are valid.
They just seem to be applied incorrectly.
Also, the agent was stopped because it reached the maximum attempts limit.

Typing continue made the situation even weirder:
Staying with the example above, where previously there suggested changes were displayed in the chat ui, now only one change is shown.
Applying this change correctly, the whole issue described above would've been resolved.
However, this change was applied incorrectly as well:

actual edits before "continue":
A -> edited A
B -> edited B
C -> edited B

actual edits after "continue":
A -> edited A
B -> edited B -> edited A
C -> edited B

Please note that this A, B, C example might not 100% accurately describe the actually displayed behavior; it's just supposed to roughly illustrate the problem

I was only able to reproduce this in a more complex codebase (i.e. in my own project, where the code can get quite messy and complex in a few places).

When trying to reproduce the issue I used Grok Code Fast 1, I don't know which model I used when I first discovered this problem.

I tried to reproduce the issue in the Simple SwiftUI project, but I had no success.
However, I was able to reproduce the problem in my own project (this is not open source so I can't link to the code here).
I didn't have the time to try it on another larger project though.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Swift
Sterne
6.3k
Forks
2k
Ø Merge
3 T. 21 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
2

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus github/CopilotForXcode

Alle Issues in github/CopilotForXcode

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Swift

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.