Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

JUnit and request recorders both record the same integration test; no way to pick one

Offen
#333 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
28/100
Issue-Typ
Feature
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
java, spring-boot
Bereich
testing, tooling

Rechercherichtung

Start by reproducing with mvn -Dtest=PetClinicIntegrationTests#testOwnerDetails test in spring-petclinic, then compare the outputs under tmp/appmap/junit and tmp/appmap/request_recording. The issue leaves open whether the fix is a configuration switch or a documented rule, so a maintainer decision is needed first. Done means one recorder is chosen when both would fire, with the rule or setting documented.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Summary

A single Spring Boot integration test that issues an HTTP request through a real port produces two recordings of the same behavior: one from the JUnit recorder, one from the request recorder. Both recorders are on by default, neither knows about the other, and there is no documented setting to disable one.

Agent 1.30.1, spring-petclinic @ b26f235.

Repro

mvn -Dtest=PetClinicIntegrationTests#testOwnerDetails test
ls tmp/appmap/junit tmp/appmap/request_recording

Observed

tmp/appmap/junit/org_..._PetClinicIntegrationTests_testOwnerDetails.appmap.json
tmp/appmap/request_recording/1789755390_129__owners_1.appmap.json

The JUnit recording contains the test method and everything under it; the request one contains the request, controller and SQL. They overlap almost entirely. The request recording's filename embeds a timestamp and a port-dependent counter, so it differs on every run and cannot serve as a stable baseline identity (the gold-traces engine's discover returns both and leaves the choice open).

Expected

A setting to select which recorder runs when both would fire (e.g. suppress request recordings that occur inside an active JUnit recording), or at least document the rule: curate the JUnit recording, use a request recording only when no test drives the endpoint.

Written by Devin

Vorherrschende Sprache
Java
Sterne
88
Forks
17
Ø Merge
2 T. 2 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
1

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus getappmap/appmap-java

Alle Issues in getappmap/appmap-java

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Java

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.