Reading a Variant column from Parquet files with different shredding layouts null-fills typed_value; every shredded field then reads as NULL, with no error

Offen
#27,089 10 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
35/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Klar beschrieben
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
rust
Bereich
backend, databases

Rechercherichtung

Start with the linked schema inference and rewrite functions in datafusion/datasource-parquet/src/file_format.rs and datafusion/physical-expr-adapter/src/schema_rewriter.rs, then read #26282 and the Variant shredding specification. Reproduce with the two mixed-layout Parquet cases in the issue and trace how the adapter handles the missing typed_value children. Done means mixed layouts preserve the Variant fields across files, with coverage for both cases.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Part of #26517.

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

I have a table of Parquet files with one Variant column, event. Each row is a small JSON object like {"service":"api","status":200,"latency_ms":12}. The files were not all written the same way:

  • a.parquet is shredded on service and status. Those two fields are stored as typed columns under typed_value; the rest stays in value.
  • b.parquet is not shredded. The whole object is in value, there is no typed_value.

Both files hold the same 3 rows. Spark reads a table like this fine. Each file also reads fine on its own in DataFusion.

Query (with datafusion-variant registered):

SELECT variant_get(event, 'service', 'VARCHAR') AS service FROM events

What I get:

+---------+
| service |
+---------+
| api     |   <- a.parquet
| api     |
| db      |
|         |   <- b.parquet
|         |
|         |
+---------+

What I expect: api, api, db for both files, so 6 non-null rows. That is what each file returns on its own.

What happens: the merged table schema has typed_value, and b.parquet does not. The schema adapter fills typed_value with NULL for that file. For a plain struct that is right. For Variant it is not: the shredding spec says a NULL typed_value means "this value is not an object", so the reader never looks in value for service. The data is still there, it is just skipped. No error, no warning.

The same thing happens when two files are shredded on different fields. Before #26195 that case failed at open; on branch-56 it null-fills too.

Describe the solution you'd like

Let an extension type decide how a file's layout maps to the table's layout, instead of the default struct null-fill. The Variant version would live in datafusion-variant. Per the discussion below I am starting with a PhysicalExprAdapter there and will report back on what, if anything, core needs.

Additional context

Repro: a 90-line Rust program that writes the two files with arrow-rs shred_variant and runs the query. It is in the edit history of this issue; I will replace it with a SQL-only version once datafusion-contrib/datafusion-variant#145 (COPY ... OPTIONS ('variant.shredding' ...)) lands.

DataFusion branch-56 at 1635ed9, arrow/parquet 60.1, datafusion-variant 642248a.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Rust
Sterne
9.6k
Forks
2.6k
Ø Merge
3 T. 4 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
345

Entwicklungsumgebung

In Codespaces öffnen

Startet den Dev-Container des Projekts im Browser, mit Ihrem eigenen GitHub-Konto.

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus apache/datafusion

Alle Issues in apache/datafusion

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Rust

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.