Pixel log: January 2026 factory images are missing, and Android 17 entries use the system fingerprint
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 48/100
Rechercherichtung
Start with checkpoint.txt and image_info.txt, then run the comparison script in the issue against the factory images page to reproduce the missing January entries and generic Android 17 matches. Inspect the pixel_verification path mentioned in the report. Done means the January images are represented and Android 17 entries use fingerprints that verify correctly for their device images.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
The Pixel log has no entries for the January 2026 release. The factory images page lists 29 images for BP4A.260105.004 (.E1, .A2, .B2, .C2) across 15 devices, and none of them are in image_info.txt at tree size 1109. December 2025 and February 2026 builds are there. To rule out a naming difference I computed the VBMeta digest of tokay-bp4a.260105.004.e1 with avbtool calculate_vbmeta_digest: b1eca34c41d308c91abcea66cf5852814cd526020041a590bd7f865aaa0900b6. It doesn't appear in the log under any fingerprint.
Separately, Android 17 builds are logged under the system partition's fingerprint. Entry 1073 is google/generic_system_google/generic:17/CP2A.260705.006/15641320:user/release-keys with digest c93d26cf284f3c3ba9301fd331b6129a8399ba44242aab9068690732239d2d26, which is tokay's image. That image's OTA metadata (post-build) and every other fingerprint property in its vbmeta say google/tokay/tokay:17/CP2A.260705.006/15641320:user/release-keys. With the same digest, the verifier returns OK for the generic fingerprint and FAILURE for the device one, so a payload built from what the phone reports won't verify. The grep on system.img in pixel_verification still finds the generic line, so the manual path works. It applies to all 103 Android 17 images from the factory page that are in the log.
Missing January 2026 images, and the script
akita BP4A.260105.004.E1
blazer BP4A.260105.004.A2 .C2 .E1
caiman BP4A.260105.004.A2 .E1
comet BP4A.260105.004.A2 .E1
felix BP4A.260105.004.E1
frankel BP4A.260105.004.A2 .C2 .E1
husky BP4A.260105.004.E1
komodo BP4A.260105.004.A2 .E1
lynx BP4A.260105.004.E1
mustang BP4A.260105.004.A2 .C2 .E1
rango BP4A.260105.004.A2 .C2 .E1
shiba BP4A.260105.004.E1
tangorpro BP4A.260105.004.E1
tegu BP4A.260105.004.B2 .C2 .E1
tokay BP4A.260105.004.A2 .E1
The script lists every factory zip on developers.google.com/android/images and looks up each (device, build) in image_info.txt, after checking the entry count against the checkpoint. It also prints the September 2026 images (CP3A.260905.009 for 21 devices and CD1A.260905.001.B1 for cubs, grizzly, kodiak and yogi); image_info.txt was last modified on August 21, so those may just be lag.
# Compare every Pixel 6+ factory image on developers.google.com/android/images
# with the Pixel Binary Transparency log's image_info.txt.
import collections, re, urllib.request
def get(url, cookie=None):
h = {"User-Agent": "curl/8"}
if cookie: h["Cookie"] = cookie
return urllib.request.urlopen(urllib.request.Request(url, headers=h)).read().decode()
BT = "https://developers.google.com/android/binary_transparency/"
size = int(get(BT + "checkpoint.txt").split("\n")[1]) # verify the signature separately
log = get(BT + "image_info.txt").strip().split("\n\n")
assert len(log) == size
logged = collections.defaultdict(set)
for entry in log:
fp = entry.split("\n")[1] # google/<product>/<device>:<ver>/<build>/...
device, build = re.match(r"google/[^/]+/([^:]+):[^/]+/([^/]+)/", fp).groups()
logged[device].add(build.upper())
site = get("https://developers.google.com/android/images", cookie="devsite_wall_acks=nexus-image-tos")
PIXEL6_AND_NEWER = {"oriole", "raven", "bluejay", "panther", "cheetah", "lynx", "tangorpro",
"felix", "shiba", "husky", "akita", "tokay", "caiman", "komodo", "comet", "tegu",
"frankel", "blazer", "mustang", "rango", "stallion", "cubs", "grizzly", "kodiak", "yogi"}
counts = collections.Counter()
for device, build in sorted(set(re.findall(r"aosp/([a-z0-9_]+)-([a-z0-9.]+)-factory-[0-9a-f]+\.zip", site))):
if device not in PIXEL6_AND_NEWER: continue
build = build.upper()
if build in logged[device]: counts["logged"] += 1
elif build in logged["generic"]: counts["logged as generic"] += 1
else: counts["missing"] += 1; print("missing", device, build)
print(f"tree size {size}:", dict(counts))
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 21
- Forks
- 6
- Ø Merge
- 1 Std. 30 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 20
Entwicklungsumgebung
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Keine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Ähnliche Issues
-
enhancement good first issue
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
-
python-version
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 88/100
-
bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 62/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
bug javascript P2-medium python release:v3.1
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
adrirubio/claude-deck#546 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
area: desktop area: website priority: P2 type: feature
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 62/100
appandflow/stim#3411 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag