Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

Whole numbers in a data Part are returned as floats (e.g. 4326 becomes 4326.0)

Offen
  • Stimmt etwas nicht?
#1,328 4 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 1 zugewiesene Person Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 3 Tagen

@rohityan arbeitet bereits daran.

Seit 09.10.2026.

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Beschreibung

component: server

Summary

When an agent sends structured data in a data Part, every whole number in that
data comes back to the client as a decimal number. For example, the integer
4326 is received as 4326.0.

This happens on the normal REST + JSON transport (the response body is JSON over
HTTPS, not gRPC). A client that expects a whole number for a field therefore
receives a decimal and may reject the message during validation.

I believe this is a side effect of how the SDK builds the JSON, not something the
A2A specification requires. I am filing it so it is written down in one place for
both maintainers and other developers who hit the same thing.

What I expected

If my agent puts the whole number 4326 into a data Part, the client should
receive 4326 (a whole number), the same value I put in.

What actually happens

The client receives 4326.0 (a decimal). This is true for every whole number
in the structured data, not just one field. In my case the same response also
turned 240 into 240.0, 500 into 500.0, and 48000000 into 48000000.0.

Why it happens (as far as I can tell)

Since the 1.0 release the SDK represents every message as a Protocol Buffers
object in memory. The data field of a Part is typed as a protobuf Struct
value:

# a2a/types/a2a_pb2.pyi
data: _struct_pb2.Value

A protobuf Struct has only one way to store a number: number_value, which is
a 64-bit floating-point number (a double). It has no separate type for whole
numbers. So the moment a whole number is placed into a Struct, it becomes a
decimal.

When the SDK produces the JSON response, it converts that protobuf object with
MessageToDict (and the streaming path yields MessageToDict per frame):

# a2a/server/routes/rest_dispatcher.py
from google.protobuf.json_format import MessageToDict, Parse
...
return A2AJSONResponse(content=MessageToDict(response))   # non-streaming
...
yield MessageToDict(response)                             # each SSE frame

MessageToDict faithfully copies the number out of the Struct — but by then it
is already a decimal, so the JSON shows 4326.0.

So the number is lost on the way in (when it is stored in the Struct), not
on the way out. The REST + JSON transport is not the cause; the cause is the
in-memory Struct typing that sits behind it.

Minimal reproduction

No server needed — this reproduces with the protobuf tools the SDK uses:

from google.protobuf import struct_pb2
from google.protobuf.json_format import ParseDict, MessageToDict

v = struct_pb2.Value()
ParseDict({"spatialReference": 4326, "assetEmployees": 240}, v)
print(MessageToDict(v))
# -> {'spatialReference': 4326.0, 'assetEmployees': 240.0}

The whole numbers go in and come out as decimals.

Environment

  • a2a-sdk version: 1.2.1 (also present in 1.2.2; unchanged by that patch)
  • Transport: REST + JSON over HTTPS, server built with create_rest_routes /
    RestDispatcher / DefaultRequestHandlerV2
  • Python 3.13

Is this a specification violation?

I do not think it is, and I want to be fair about that. The A2A data Part holds
general structured JSON, and plain JSON does not separate whole numbers from
decimals — 4326 and 4326.0 are the same JSON number. So a strict reading of
the spec is satisfied.

The problem is practical, not formal: many real clients and schemas do treat
whole numbers and decimals as different types (for example, an identifier field
typed as an integer). For those clients, receiving 4326.0 where they modelled
4326 is a validation failure. This is a loss of fidelity — the value you sent
is not the value shape the receiver gets back — introduced by the move to
protobuf types, even though no rule is technically broken.

This is closely related to #884 (the removal of Pydantic models and the resulting
rough edges of the proto-only path). This is one concrete, user-visible symptom of
that.

Suggested resolution (small and spec-safe)

I am not asking you to change the wire format or break the spec. Either of these
would help:

  1. Document it clearly. State in the docs that whole numbers in a data Part
    are delivered as decimals, so client authors expect it and coerce on their side.
    This alone would have saved me a long investigation.
  2. Offer an opt-in way to keep whole numbers whole. For example, a
    serialization helper or flag that narrows decimals with no fractional part back
    to whole numbers when producing the JSON. Opt-in, so nothing changes for anyone
    who does not ask for it.

Workaround for anyone else who finds this

Until the above exists, fix it on the client: when you expect a whole number
for a field, accept a decimal whose fractional part is zero and convert it back to
a whole number (reject only genuinely fractional values). Scope this to fields
that are meant to be whole numbers — do not blanket-convert, or you will corrupt
values that are legitimately decimals (coordinates, distances, measurements).

Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
2.2k
Forks
511
Ø Merge
4 T. 1 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
40

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus a2aproject/a2a-python

Alle Issues in a2aproject/a2a-python

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Python

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.