close() api is not shutting down connection
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- networking
Rechercherichtung
Start with ws4py.client.threadedclient.WebSocketClient, especially close(), received_message(), and run_forever(), using the supplied client example to reproduce the behavior. Check how termination flags affect message delivery and verify that calling close() stops subsequent messages and reaches the closed() callback.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Hi,
I am trying to write a websocket client that listens from a websocket server for some events and dumps them on screen. If the length of message exceeds 250 chars, I wan the connection to close. I have written the following code for it:
import time
from ws4py.client.threadedclient import WebSocketClient
WS_HOST='172.17.0.2:8081'
EVENTS_URL = 'ws://' + WS_HOST + '/events'
FAULTS_URL = 'ws://' + WS_HOST + '/faults'
ALARMS_URL = 'ws://' + WS_HOST + '/alarms'
ECHO_URL = 'ws://echo.websocket.org/'
class SNMPWebSocketClient(WebSocketClient):
def opened(self):
print 'Opened client at {0}'.format(self.url)
def closed(self, code, reason=None):
print "Closed down", code, reason
def received_message(self, m):
print m
print 'Client={0}, server={0}'.format(self.client_terminated, self.server_terminated)
print len(m)
if len(m) >= 272:
print 'Send close signal'
self.close()
print '\n\n'
if __name__ == '__main__':
ws = SNMPWebSocketClient(EVENTS_URL)
try:
ws.connect()
ws.run_forever()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
ws.close(code=1002, reason='kb yay Interrupt')
time.sleep(1)
print 'Kb Interrupt'
But while listening the close never goes through. The client and server flags for terminated shows 'True' but still the client keeps receiving messages. Is there something wrong in my use of close()? Or is this how the websocket client is supposed to work until it is explicitly killed?
Here is the output:
$ python threaded_ws.py
Opened client at ws://172.17.0.2:8081/events
{"Enable":true,"OwnerId":1,"OwnerName":"ASICD","EventName":"PortOperStateDown","Description":"Port Operational State DOWN Event","SrcObjName":"Port","EvtId":2,"TimeStamp":"2017-03-28T14:38:32.881456505Z","SrcObjKey":{"IntfRef":"eth25"},"AdditionalData":null}
Client=False, server=False
258
{"Enable":true,"OwnerId":1,"OwnerName":"ASICD","EventName":"VlanOperStateDown","Description":"Vlan Operational State DOWN Event","SrcObjName":"Vlan","EvtId":4,"TimeStamp":"2017-03-28T14:38:32.882046191Z","SrcObjKey":{"VlanId":3050},"AdditionalData":null}
Client=False, server=False
254
{"Enable":true,"OwnerId":1,"OwnerName":"ASICD","EventName":"IPv4IntfOperStateDown","Description":"IPv4 Interface Operational State DOWN Event","SrcObjName":"IPv4Intf","EvtId":6,"TimeStamp":"2017-03-28T14:38:32.883912357Z","SrcObjKey":{"IntfRef":"eth25"},"AdditionalData":null}
Client=False, server=False
276
Send close signal
{"Enable":true,"OwnerId":1,"OwnerName":"ASICD","EventName":"PortOperStateUp","Description":"Port Operational State UP Event","SrcObjName":"Port","EvtId":1,"TimeStamp":"2017-03-28T14:38:33.38139292Z","SrcObjKey":{"IntfRef":"eth25"},"AdditionalData":null}
Client=True, server=True
253
{"Enable":true,"OwnerId":1,"OwnerName":"ASICD","EventName":"VlanOperStateUp","Description":"Vlan Operational State UP Event","SrcObjName":"Vlan","EvtId":3,"TimeStamp":"2017-03-28T14:38:33.382071856Z","SrcObjKey":{"VlanId":3050},"AdditionalData":null}
Client=True, server=True
250
{"Enable":true,"OwnerId":1,"OwnerName":"ASICD","EventName":"IPv4IntfOperStateUp","Description":"IPv4 Interface Operational State UP Event","SrcObjName":"IPv4Intf","EvtId":5,"TimeStamp":"2017-03-28T14:38:33.382852609Z","SrcObjKey":{"IntfRef":"eth25"},"AdditionalData":null}
Client=True, server=True
272
Send close signal
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 285
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Entwicklungsumgebung
Dieses Projekt bietet weder Dev-Container noch Dockerfile noch Beitragsleitfaden – die Einrichtung liegt bei Ihnen. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 48/100
Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python#308 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 45/100
Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python#300 ·
-
This project is not well maintained so be very very very patient!Evtl. wieder frei @Lawouach hat das vor 684 Tagen übernommen, und es ist kein Pull Request offen. Offenquestion
Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python#297 · 2 Kommentare · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 20/100
Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python#296 ·
-
Make the codes python 3 compatibleEvtl. wieder frei @auvipy hat das vor 1090 Tagen übernommen, und es ist kein Pull Request offen. Offen
Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python#280 · 1 Kommentar · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
Alle Issues in Lawouach/WebSocket-for-Python
Ähnliche Issues
-
bump patch
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
autowarefoundation/autoware_carla_scenario#1321 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
QuantConnect/Documentation#2838 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
get_all_subclasses must deduplicate by class identityEvtl. vergeben @Gambit-Checkmate hat das heute übernommen. Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 15 Tagen
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
awslabs/route53-dynamic-dns-with-lambda#67 · 1 Kommentar ·