dincli model-owner: deploy sends stale constructor args (broken); no command for releaseGIRegistrationSlots (BL-27, BL-28)
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- python, solidity
- Bereich
- backend-api-design, cli
Rechercherichtung
Read dincli/cli/modelownerd/deploy.py alongside the constructors in foundry/src/DINTaskCoordinator.sol and foundry/src/DINTaskAuditor.sol to understand the missing modelId_ and when the registry assigns it. Then inspect the model registration flow to determine how that value can be supplied. For slot release, start with releaseGIRegistrationSlots in the coordinator contract and the model-owner CLI commands; done means deployment handles the constructor arguments and an available CLI command can release slots after a GI ends.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Two separate, both-confirmed gaps in the model-owner tooling, batched here since they're the same area of the codebase (dincli/cli/modelownerd/) and the same root-cause category (dincli not kept in sync with a foundry/src contract change).
Part 1 (BL-27): dincli model-owner deploy is broken against current contracts
dincli/cli/modelownerd/deploy.py calls:
DINTaskCoordinator_contract.constructor(din_validator_stake_address) # 1 arg
DINTaskAuditor_contract.constructor(din_validator_stake_address, task_coordinator_address) # 2 args
but the actual constructors (foundry/src/DINTaskCoordinator.sol:290, foundry/src/DINTaskAuditor.sol:406-410, verified against develop @ 740a613) are:
constructor(address dinvalidatorStakeContract_address, uint256 modelId_)
constructor(address _dinvalidatorStakeContract_address, address _dintaskcoordinator_contract_address, uint256 modelId_)
Both calls are missing modelId_. Verified by inspection against the current ABI — dincli model-owner deploy task-coordinator/task-auditor will fail at ABI encoding today. This is hidden in testing because tests/ deploys task contracts from stale hardhat artifacts, not the bundled foundry-derived ABIs.
This isn't a one-line fix — DINModelRegistry only assigns modelId at approveModel() time, after the task contracts must already exist (the registration flow requires already-deployed, already-owned taskCoordinator/taskAuditor addresses as input). So deploy-time modelId_ doesn't exist yet when these constructors run. Needs a decision: a placeholder/sentinel modelId at deploy time later reconciled at approval, a registry-side pre-assignment step before deploy, or a constructor change removing the dependency — out of scope for me to prescribe here, flagging for whoever picks this up.
Part 2 (BL-28): no dincli command for releaseGIRegistrationSlots
DINTaskCoordinator.releaseGIRegistrationSlots(gi) (L1287-1299) is the only function that decrements validators' activeRegistrationCount after a GI ends — endGI deliberately doesn't, to stay O(1) (BL-10). It's present in the bundled ABI (dincli/abis/DINTaskCoordinator.json) but grepping all of dincli/ turns up zero callers.
Currently harmless: maxConcurrentRegistrationsPerStakeUnit (DinValidatorStake.sol:115) defaults to 0, so the cap it would otherwise enforce (TC_ConcurrentRegistrationCapReached/TA_ConcurrentRegistrationCapReached) never fires. But the moment any network sets that cap above 0, every ended GI permanently consumes its validators' concurrent-registration slots until they hit the cap — with no dincli path to call the one function that frees them.
Suggested approach
- Part 1: fix the constructor args once the
modelIdsourcing decision is made; add a dincli-level smoke test that actually deploys against the real foundry artifact (not hardhat) to catch this class of drift going forward. - Part 2: add
dincli model-owner release-gi-slots <gi>(or fold into an existingmodel-owner gi ...subcommand), callable any time after the target GI reachesGIended.
References
Developer/BACK_LOG.mdBL-27, BL-28- PR #204 review (source of both findings)
- BL-10 (why
endGIdoesn't release slots inline)
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 4
- Forks
- 7
- Ø Merge
- 3 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 34
Entwicklungsumgebung
Dieses Projekt bietet weder Dev-Container noch Dockerfile noch Beitragsleitfaden – die Einrichtung liegt bei Ihnen. Beginnen Sie mit der README; die allgemeinen Schritte stehen in unserem Leitfaden für den ersten Beitrag.
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet
-
ROADMAP.md: refresh "What is still open for P3" (several items were fixed in October)Evtl. vergeben @umermjd11 hat das vor 2 Tagen übernommen. Offendocumentation good first issue
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 74/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#285 · 1 Kommentar · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Update the 25 translated organisation READMEs to match the English versionEvtl. vergeben @mrCabez hat das heute übernommen. Offengood first issue help wanted
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 76/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#277 · 2 Kommentare · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Update the client-service guide to explain training and uploading separatelyEvtl. vergeben Ein verknüpfter Pull Request ist offen oder bereits gemergt. Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 76/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#266 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 25/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#299 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Long run
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 25/100
InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet#298 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in InfiniteZeroFoundation/DevNet
Ähnliche Issues
-
priority middle
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 62/100
KATO-Hiro/AtCoderClans#12940 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 76/100
huggingface/huggingface_hub#5283 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
enhancement
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 86/100
ccxt/ccxt#31045 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
bug example
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 86/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag