[低] 播放计时使用 time.time() 而非 monotonic
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 80/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- desktop-dev
Research direction
Open windows/birdlock/app/state.py around lines 1206-1224 and read the playback timer loop: note every time.time() call and where those values are stored or compared. Replace them with time.monotonic() consistently, since monotonic values cannot be mixed with wall-clock timestamps. No test is named, so done means the timer math no longer depends on the system clock; the issue notes it was not reproduced on Windows hardware, so keep the change minimal and easy to review.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
位置：windows/birdlock/app/state.py:1206-1224
现象：系统时钟被 NTP 或用户调整时，播放可能跳帧或停顿。
建议：改用 time.monotonic()。
来源：2026-11-15 全仓只读审计，PR #7 未包含此项。 未在 Windows 实机复现，复现路径由代码审计推得。
- Dominant language
- Swift
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 1h 11m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from cyandee/BirdLock
-
Difficulty 2/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 80/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100