README utilization example uses --processes, but the command defines --workers
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 90/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- cli, documentation
Research direction
Open the README's Utilization section and compare its worker command example with WorkerCommand.add_arguments(), which defines the available flags. Update the example so it uses the intended option, then verify that the documented command no longer produces an unrecognised-argument error.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Noted while adding the Queues section to the README (fair multi-queue scheduling, codingjoe-fair-multi-queue-scheduling).
The README's Utilization section advertises:
uv run manage.py threadmill worker --processes 4 --threads 2
but WorkerCommand.add_arguments() defines -w/--workers, not --processes. The example fails with an unrecognised-argument error.
Fix is to rename the flag in the README example (or add an alias, if --processes is the intended name).
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 19h 11m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from codingjoe/threadmill
-
Difficulty 2/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 84/100
codingjoe/threadmill#52 ·
-
WorkerProcess passes None poll intervals to the backend, breaking acquire in the consumer thread Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
codingjoe/threadmill#53 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
codingjoe/threadmill#47 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
codingjoe/threadmill#55 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 72/100
codingjoe/threadmill#54 ·
All issues in codingjoe/threadmill
Similar issues
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comment ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Openarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·