[essnmx] Fix typo in NXLauetof application definition
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
@nightcityblade is already working on this.
Since Sep 23, 2026.
- #769 by @SatvikMishra08 — closed without merging
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 95/100
Research direction
The typo is in the file packages/essnmx/src/ess/nmx/types.py at line 275. Open that file, locate the string 'definitions' and change it to 'definition'. Verify the change by checking the context around line 275, then run any existing tests for the essnmx module to ensure nothing is broken.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This should be definition, not definitions...
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 4d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 19
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from scipp/ess
-
[essnmx] essmandi-reduce writes entry/instrument/name = "NMX" for MANDI dataPossibly taken @YooSunYoung claimed this 27 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
essdiffraction
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
[essimaging] `maximum_resolution_achievable` should not hardcode "time" as the "third" dimensionPossibly taken @jokasimr claimed this 183 days ago. Openessimaging
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
essreduce
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
Similar issues
-
Atomic append fails to create a missing filePossibly taken @harbinresearcher claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
fabiocaccamo/python-fsutil#201 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
task
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
danparshall/claude_researcher#87 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
GhostManager/Ghostwriter#998 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
datajoint/datajoint-python#1586 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day