Incorrect singularized noun
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
Research direction
Start by reproducing the behavior of pattern.en.singularize("miseries") and inspect the singularization entry point in the pattern.en module. The work is done when the function returns "misery" for this input and existing singularization behavior remains intact.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
pattern.en.singularize("miseries") gives 'miseries' while the correct singular noun would be 'misery'.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8.9k
- Forks
- 1.6k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from clips/pattern
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
Similar issues
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
simonw/sqlite-utils#872 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100